<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Food, nutrition, and cancer prevention: the latest word</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foodpolitics.com/2007/10/diet-nutrition-and-cancer-prevention-the-latest-word/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2007/10/diet-nutrition-and-cancer-prevention-the-latest-word/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:07:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erin Christman</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2007/10/diet-nutrition-and-cancer-prevention-the-latest-word/comment-page-1/#comment-9761</link>
		<dc:creator>Erin Christman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 15:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/2007/10/31/diet-nutrition-and-cancer-prevention-the-latest-word/#comment-9761</guid>
		<description>I took a look at the link to Sandy Szwarc&#039;s blog. I&#039;m not a scientist, so I couldn&#039;t review her analysis, but I did Google her, and found out that she&#039;s associated with a couple of &quot;astroturf&quot; (ie, not grassroots) groups like Tech Central Station and the National Council Against Health Fraud.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I took a look at the link to Sandy Szwarc&#8217;s blog. I&#8217;m not a scientist, so I couldn&#8217;t review her analysis, but I did Google her, and found out that she&#8217;s associated with a couple of &#8220;astroturf&#8221; (ie, not grassroots) groups like Tech Central Station and the National Council Against Health Fraud.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cancer research uk &#187; Diet, nutrition, and cancer prevention: the latest word</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2007/10/diet-nutrition-and-cancer-prevention-the-latest-word/comment-page-1/#comment-9760</link>
		<dc:creator>cancer research uk &#187; Diet, nutrition, and cancer prevention: the latest word</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 16:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/2007/10/31/diet-nutrition-and-cancer-prevention-the-latest-word/#comment-9760</guid>
		<description>[...] unknown wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptThe American Institute for Cancer Research has just come out with an update report on its 1997 report on diet and cancer risk and prevention. After five years of research, the committee doing the report has ten recommendations. &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] unknown wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptThe American Institute for Cancer Research has just come out with an update report on its 1997 report on diet and cancer risk and prevention. After five years of research, the committee doing the report has ten recommendations. &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anton</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2007/10/diet-nutrition-and-cancer-prevention-the-latest-word/comment-page-1/#comment-9759</link>
		<dc:creator>Anton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 18:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/2007/10/31/diet-nutrition-and-cancer-prevention-the-latest-word/#comment-9759</guid>
		<description>My guess is, diet doesn&#039;t have a whole lot to do with cancer.  Maybe a bit around the margins.  If it diet were that pivotal -- on the order of asbestos exposure or smoking -- the effect would get more and more pronounced the more you study it.  And it clearly doesn&#039;t.  You need 1,200 studies to see even small effects.

I&#039;m guessing that any food or component studied thus far isn&#039;t a big factor in cancer.

No idea what it is, but I doubt that its food.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My guess is, diet doesn&#8217;t have a whole lot to do with cancer.  Maybe a bit around the margins.  If it diet were that pivotal &#8212; on the order of asbestos exposure or smoking &#8212; the effect would get more and more pronounced the more you study it.  And it clearly doesn&#8217;t.  You need 1,200 studies to see even small effects.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m guessing that any food or component studied thus far isn&#8217;t a big factor in cancer.</p>
<p>No idea what it is, but I doubt that its food.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bix</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2007/10/diet-nutrition-and-cancer-prevention-the-latest-word/comment-page-1/#comment-9758</link>
		<dc:creator>Bix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 18:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/2007/10/31/diet-nutrition-and-cancer-prevention-the-latest-word/#comment-9758</guid>
		<description>If it&#039;s true, Anton, as you and Sandy Szwarc say, that none of these recommendations are valid ... what does influence the initiation and progression of cancer? I mean, if not body weight, diet, physical activity ... then what?  What should researchers be studying instead?  (Not being contrary, just really wondering.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it&#8217;s true, Anton, as you and Sandy Szwarc say, that none of these recommendations are valid &#8230; what does influence the initiation and progression of cancer? I mean, if not body weight, diet, physical activity &#8230; then what?  What should researchers be studying instead?  (Not being contrary, just really wondering.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anton</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2007/10/diet-nutrition-and-cancer-prevention-the-latest-word/comment-page-1/#comment-9757</link>
		<dc:creator>Anton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 16:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/2007/10/31/diet-nutrition-and-cancer-prevention-the-latest-word/#comment-9757</guid>
		<description>Okay, I actually looked at the data in the report.

Mostly epidemiology. Correlations only.  Which has its own problems.  Although they somehow found a way to &quot;Find causality in correlations.&quot;

Virtually ALL the &#039;correlations&#039; are RR, relative risk, and TINY.

Oddly, many of the actual recommendations aren&#039;t even supported by their own results.

Sandy Szwarc does an excellent review here:

http://junkfoodscience.blogspot.com/2007/11/jfs-exclusive-whats-evidence-cancers.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, I actually looked at the data in the report.</p>
<p>Mostly epidemiology. Correlations only.  Which has its own problems.  Although they somehow found a way to &#8220;Find causality in correlations.&#8221;</p>
<p>Virtually ALL the &#8216;correlations&#8217; are RR, relative risk, and TINY.</p>
<p>Oddly, many of the actual recommendations aren&#8217;t even supported by their own results.</p>
<p>Sandy Szwarc does an excellent review here:</p>
<p><a href="http://junkfoodscience.blogspot.com/2007/11/jfs-exclusive-whats-evidence-cancers.html" rel="nofollow">http://junkfoodscience.blogspot.com/2007/11/jfs-exclusive-whats-evidence-cancers.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bix</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2007/10/diet-nutrition-and-cancer-prevention-the-latest-word/comment-page-1/#comment-9756</link>
		<dc:creator>Bix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 11:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/2007/10/31/diet-nutrition-and-cancer-prevention-the-latest-word/#comment-9756</guid>
		<description>&quot;Limit intake of red meat.&quot;

Do I eat red meat to keep my carb intake down and my intake of beneficial? saturated fat up, which I&#039;ve read (via advocates of low-carb diets) will decrease my risk for cancer?

Or do I limit red meat which, by some mechanism?, will reduce my risk for cancer?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Limit intake of red meat.&#8221;</p>
<p>Do I eat red meat to keep my carb intake down and my intake of beneficial? saturated fat up, which I&#8217;ve read (via advocates of low-carb diets) will decrease my risk for cancer?</p>
<p>Or do I limit red meat which, by some mechanism?, will reduce my risk for cancer?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: damotion</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2007/10/diet-nutrition-and-cancer-prevention-the-latest-word/comment-page-1/#comment-9755</link>
		<dc:creator>damotion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 09:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/2007/10/31/diet-nutrition-and-cancer-prevention-the-latest-word/#comment-9755</guid>
		<description>[...] can read the full story here     No Comments so far  Leave a comment   RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI    [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] can read the full story here     No Comments so far  Leave a comment   RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI    [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anton</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2007/10/diet-nutrition-and-cancer-prevention-the-latest-word/comment-page-1/#comment-9754</link>
		<dc:creator>Anton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 01:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/2007/10/31/diet-nutrition-and-cancer-prevention-the-latest-word/#comment-9754</guid>
		<description>All wonderful stuff.  But it tends to perpetuate the feeling that &quot;If you get cancer, it&#039;s your fault you slugabed meat-eating candy-hound, you.&quot;  I&#039;m not sure that&#039;s useful.

Also missing from the report so far is some sense of scale or perspective on these findings.  Obesity is related to an increase in esophageal cancer?  What is the MAGNITUDE of that effect?  Are we talking about doubling the risk from 0.02% to 0.04%?  Or what?

This blind and blanket talk of gives rise to gross misperceptions.  &quot;Broccoli fights cancer.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All wonderful stuff.  But it tends to perpetuate the feeling that &#8220;If you get cancer, it&#8217;s your fault you slugabed meat-eating candy-hound, you.&#8221;  I&#8217;m not sure that&#8217;s useful.</p>
<p>Also missing from the report so far is some sense of scale or perspective on these findings.  Obesity is related to an increase in esophageal cancer?  What is the MAGNITUDE of that effect?  Are we talking about doubling the risk from 0.02% to 0.04%?  Or what?</p>
<p>This blind and blanket talk of gives rise to gross misperceptions.  &#8220;Broccoli fights cancer.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diet Foods &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Diet, nutrition, and cancer prevention: the latest word</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2007/10/diet-nutrition-and-cancer-prevention-the-latest-word/comment-page-1/#comment-9753</link>
		<dc:creator>Diet Foods &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Diet, nutrition, and cancer prevention: the latest word</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 00:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/2007/10/31/diet-nutrition-and-cancer-prevention-the-latest-word/#comment-9753</guid>
		<description>[...] Marion wrote an interesting post today on Diet, nutrition, and cancer prevention: the latest wordHere&#8217;s a quick excerptEat mostly foods of plant origin. Limit intake of red meat and avoid processed meat. Limit alcoholic drinks. Limit consumption of salt. Avoid mouldy cereals (grains) or pulses (legumes). Aim to meet nutritional needs through diet alone. &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Marion wrote an interesting post today on Diet, nutrition, and cancer prevention: the latest wordHere&#8217;s a quick excerptEat mostly foods of plant origin. Limit intake of red meat and avoid processed meat. Limit alcoholic drinks. Limit consumption of salt. Avoid mouldy cereals (grains) or pulses (legumes). Aim to meet nutritional needs through diet alone. &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#160; Diet, nutrition, and cancer prevention: the latest word&#160;by&#160;medTRIALS.info</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2007/10/diet-nutrition-and-cancer-prevention-the-latest-word/comment-page-1/#comment-9752</link>
		<dc:creator>&#160; Diet, nutrition, and cancer prevention: the latest word&#160;by&#160;medTRIALS.info</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 19:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/2007/10/31/diet-nutrition-and-cancer-prevention-the-latest-word/#comment-9752</guid>
		<description>[...] years of research, the committee doing the report has ten recommendations. &#8230;Original post by Marion delivered by Medtrials and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] years of research, the committee doing the report has ten recommendations. &#8230;Original post by Marion delivered by Medtrials and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

