<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bad news about acrylamide</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foodpolitics.com/2007/11/bad-news-about-acrylamide/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2007/11/bad-news-about-acrylamide/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:17:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: teresa</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2007/11/bad-news-about-acrylamide/comment-page-1/#comment-10007</link>
		<dc:creator>teresa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 03:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/2007/11/30/bad-news-about-acrylamide/#comment-10007</guid>
		<description>just curious why &quot;acrylamide&quot; is no longer listed as a &quot;topic&quot; in your list of posts, when this post on the subject still exists? i noticed it in your topics when i first started following your blog a few months ago. did new information come out that the public should be aware of?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just curious why &#8220;acrylamide&#8221; is no longer listed as a &#8220;topic&#8221; in your list of posts, when this post on the subject still exists? i noticed it in your topics when i first started following your blog a few months ago. did new information come out that the public should be aware of?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2007/11/bad-news-about-acrylamide/comment-page-1/#comment-10006</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 07:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/2007/11/30/bad-news-about-acrylamide/#comment-10006</guid>
		<description>I knew about acrylamides in french fries some time ago.   Commercial friench fries are sprayed with a sugary coating to actually increase the reaction.   But a quick look for more info about acrylomides yields more unsavory info.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acrylamide

Yet more good reasons to keep consumption of baked breads, crackers and fried or microwaved oily starchy foods to a minimum, just to be on the safe side (as if there weren&#039;t enough good reasons to reduce french fry consumption).  Hmmm, sounds like the low starch way of eating is looking healthier every day :-).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I knew about acrylamides in french fries some time ago.   Commercial friench fries are sprayed with a sugary coating to actually increase the reaction.   But a quick look for more info about acrylomides yields more unsavory info.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acrylamide" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acrylamide</a></p>
<p>Yet more good reasons to keep consumption of baked breads, crackers and fried or microwaved oily starchy foods to a minimum, just to be on the safe side (as if there weren&#8217;t enough good reasons to reduce french fry consumption).  Hmmm, sounds like the low starch way of eating is looking healthier every day <img src='http://www.foodpolitics.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kajun36 &#187; Bad news about acrylamide</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2007/11/bad-news-about-acrylamide/comment-page-1/#comment-10005</link>
		<dc:creator>kajun36 &#187; Bad news about acrylamide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 20:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/2007/11/30/bad-news-about-acrylamide/#comment-10005</guid>
		<description>[...] Check it out! While looking through the blogosphere we stumbled on an interesting post today.Here&#8217;s a quick excerpt A question posted about acrylamide asks: “I heard on the radio today that a study has demonstrated that the cooking of potatoes in oil, whether on top or in the oven, raises acrylamide to dangerous levels. In my novice readings, I have learned that traditional, more saturated fats may be more stable than the industrial veggie oils. So, to what extent are these results impacted by the frying fat?” Acrylamide is a puzzle. It is a bad carcinogen but it appears in just about any carbohydrate-conta [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Check it out! While looking through the blogosphere we stumbled on an interesting post today.Here&#8217;s a quick excerpt A question posted about acrylamide asks: “I heard on the radio today that a study has demonstrated that the cooking of potatoes in oil, whether on top or in the oven, raises acrylamide to dangerous levels. In my novice readings, I have learned that traditional, more saturated fats may be more stable than the industrial veggie oils. So, to what extent are these results impacted by the frying fat?” Acrylamide is a puzzle. It is a bad carcinogen but it appears in just about any carbohydrate-conta [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

