Comments on: USDA proposes to define “Natural” http://www.foodpolitics.com/2007/12/usda-proposes-to-define-natural/ Thu, 29 Jul 2010 17:52:29 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: Anna http://www.foodpolitics.com/2007/12/usda-proposes-to-define-natural/comment-page-1/#comment-10031 Anna Tue, 04 Dec 2007 18:20:25 +0000 http://www.foodpolitics.com/2007/12/01/usda-proposes-to-define-natural/#comment-10031 What would be a better idea is for people to start knowing about their food again instead of letting the government and the marketers define "natural". But I guess the are too busy doing all sorts of more important things than nourishing their bodies. What would be a better idea is for people to start knowing about their food again instead of letting the government and the marketers define “natural”.

But I guess the are too busy doing all sorts of more important things than nourishing their bodies.

]]> By: Daniel Snowy Ithaca,NY http://www.foodpolitics.com/2007/12/usda-proposes-to-define-natural/comment-page-1/#comment-10030 Daniel Snowy Ithaca,NY Tue, 04 Dec 2007 12:51:18 +0000 http://www.foodpolitics.com/2007/12/01/usda-proposes-to-define-natural/#comment-10030 It sounds like a good idea. It would be nice if they would also define natural for other, non-meat products. It sounds like a good idea. It would be nice if they would also define natural for other, non-meat products.

]]>