<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New food rating label: a step forward?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foodpolitics.com/2008/10/new-food-rating-label-a-step-forward/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2008/10/new-food-rating-label-a-step-forward/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:20:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marion</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2008/10/new-food-rating-label-a-step-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-11616</link>
		<dc:creator>Marion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 20:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/2008/10/28/new-food-rating-label-a-step-forward/#comment-11616</guid>
		<description>No kidding?  I&#039;d like to see that RFP.  Thanks for writing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No kidding?  I&#8217;d like to see that RFP.  Thanks for writing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Tannenbaum</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2008/10/new-food-rating-label-a-step-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-11615</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Tannenbaum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 20:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/2008/10/28/new-food-rating-label-a-step-forward/#comment-11615</guid>
		<description>Smart Choice suffers from an inherent funding stream conflict of interest and can never have integrity. It is voluntary and fully funded by industry. Even the RFP from Keystone (where it seeks an administrator foir the program) repeatedly states that the administrator should limit the costs and burdens on food manufacturers. As soon as the burdens are too high, manufacturers will defund and move onto an icon system that is less onerous.

There are already 25 icons on US grocery shelves touting simllar standards. Short of an FDA mandate for all foods to be compared on nutritional quality, this is all just PR fluff.

Rick Tannenbaum
http://www.foodrecalls.blogspot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smart Choice suffers from an inherent funding stream conflict of interest and can never have integrity. It is voluntary and fully funded by industry. Even the RFP from Keystone (where it seeks an administrator foir the program) repeatedly states that the administrator should limit the costs and burdens on food manufacturers. As soon as the burdens are too high, manufacturers will defund and move onto an icon system that is less onerous.</p>
<p>There are already 25 icons on US grocery shelves touting simllar standards. Short of an FDA mandate for all foods to be compared on nutritional quality, this is all just PR fluff.</p>
<p>Rick Tannenbaum<br />
<a href="http://www.foodrecalls.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.foodrecalls.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What to Eat &#187; Eating Liberally: What&#8217;s up with salt?</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2008/10/new-food-rating-label-a-step-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-11614</link>
		<dc:creator>What to Eat &#187; Eating Liberally: What&#8217;s up with salt?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 17:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/2008/10/28/new-food-rating-label-a-step-forward/#comment-11614</guid>
		<description>[...] kidney stones in children and the food industry&#8217;s new Smart Choices labeling system which, as I pointed out a few days ago, is particularly generous in the salt standard.   &#171; Dietary Guidelines: the process [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] kidney stones in children and the food industry&#8217;s new Smart Choices labeling system which, as I pointed out a few days ago, is particularly generous in the salt standard.   &laquo; Dietary Guidelines: the process [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hemi W</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2008/10/new-food-rating-label-a-step-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-11613</link>
		<dc:creator>Hemi W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 18:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/2008/10/28/new-food-rating-label-a-step-forward/#comment-11613</guid>
		<description>If anybody is interested, I&#039;ve posted separate reviews of Smart Choices and NuVal , as well as a brief history of food labeling in the US since the 1860&#039;s.
check out www.fooducate.com/blog</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If anybody is interested, I&#8217;ve posted separate reviews of Smart Choices and NuVal , as well as a brief history of food labeling in the US since the 1860&#8242;s.<br />
check out <a href="http://www.fooducate.com/blog" rel="nofollow">http://www.fooducate.com/blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shari L.</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2008/10/new-food-rating-label-a-step-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-11612</link>
		<dc:creator>Shari L.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 01:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/2008/10/28/new-food-rating-label-a-step-forward/#comment-11612</guid>
		<description>Dr. Nestle:

How reliable is the label, &quot;Certified Humane?&quot;

Many thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr. Nestle:</p>
<p>How reliable is the label, &#8220;Certified Humane?&#8221;</p>
<p>Many thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

