<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Which peanut butter products are OK?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/01/which-peanut-butter-products-are-ok/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/01/which-peanut-butter-products-are-ok/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:20:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/01/which-peanut-butter-products-are-ok/comment-page-1/#comment-11990</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 14:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=1067#comment-11990</guid>
		<description>Great blog.Today&#039;s news is that the Georgia plant apparently knowingly shipped contaminated product, and apparently used a private lab that gave negative results for salmonella after the plant&#039;s own in-house tests were positive. I wondered about the insurance issues for the plant. Since there was a salmonella in peanut butter event a few years ago, I wondered what requirements the Georgia plant&#039;s insurance carrier would have for testing, if any. Could the outside lab tests have been done to satisfy their insurer rather than some other purpose? I think the insurance issue is interesting in light of the lack of meaningful government oversight. Would appreciate any thoughts on this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great blog.Today&#8217;s news is that the Georgia plant apparently knowingly shipped contaminated product, and apparently used a private lab that gave negative results for salmonella after the plant&#8217;s own in-house tests were positive. I wondered about the insurance issues for the plant. Since there was a salmonella in peanut butter event a few years ago, I wondered what requirements the Georgia plant&#8217;s insurance carrier would have for testing, if any. Could the outside lab tests have been done to satisfy their insurer rather than some other purpose? I think the insurance issue is interesting in light of the lack of meaningful government oversight. Would appreciate any thoughts on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

