Feb
2
2009
Food industry wants stronger FDA?
Food safety must be becoming a huge problem for the food industry. A group of ten food trade associations, one of them the Grocery Manufacturers of America, is calling on Congress to give the FDA the resources and power to impose stronger food safety regulations. Really? Have food companies finally figured out that a strong FDA would be good for business (consumer confidence, level playing field)? Or are they thinking that this will give them the chance to write the regulations?
Leave a comment
Next public appearance
Feb
15
2012
New York: NGO Working Group on Food and Hunger, U.N.
Policy lunch talk in the series “the future of global food policy,” UN church Centre, 777 UN Plaza @44th St and 1st Ave, 1:00-2:45.
Search
Related posts
Topics for this post
All Topics
5-a-Day
AAFP(American Academy of Family Physicians)
AAP(American Academy of Pediatrics)
Acrylamide
ACSH(American Council on Science and Health)
Activity
ADA(American Dietetic Association)
Addiction
Additives
Advocacy
Agave
Aging
Agriculture
AHA(American Heart Association)
Alcohol
Alice-Waters
Allergies
American-Diabetes-Association
Animals
Antibiotics
Antioxidants
Arsenic
Artificial-sweeteners
ASN(American Society of Nutrition)
Asthma
Açaí
Beef
Bill-Marler
Biofuel
Blogs
Books
Bottled-water
BPA(Bisphenol-A)
Bread
Breakfast
Breast-feeding
Brian-Wansink
Bribery
Burger-King
Caffeine
CAFOs(Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations)
calcium
Calorie-labeling
Calories
Campbell
Canada
Cancer
Candy
Cantaloupe
Carcinogens
Cargill
CCF(Center for Consumer Freedom)
CDC(Centers for Disease Control)
CDC(Centers for Disease Control)
Cereals
Charlie-Rose
Checkoff
Cheerios
Cheese
Chickens
China
Chinese-infant-formula
Chocolate
Cholesterol
Climate change
Cloned-animals
Coca-Cola
Coffee
Colbert
Comments-Monitoring-Policy
Comments-Policy-Monitoring
ConAgra
Conflicts-of-interest
Consolidation
Consumer Reports
Cookie-dough
Cooking
Cooking-measurements
COOL(Country of Origin Labeling)
Corn
CSPI(Center for Science in the Public Interest)
CSR(Corporate Social Responsibility)
Dairy
Del Monte
Denmark
Diabetes
Diet-and-dieting
Diet-and-energy-drinks
Diet-drugs
Dietary-Guidelines
Disney
E.coli
Eat-less-and-move-more
EatingLiberally
EFSA
EFSA(European Food Safety Authority)
Eggs
EPA
Eric-Schlosser
Ethanol
Ethics
Events
Excerpt
FAO
FAQ
Farm-bill
Farm-policy
Farm-workers
farmers markets
farms
Fast food
Fats-and-oils
FDA
feed efficiency
Fiber
films
First Amendment
Fish
Flaxseed
FMI(Food Marketing Institute)
Food
Food-and-Water-Watch
Food-art
Food-assistance
Food-availability
Food-choice
Food-colors
Food-composition
Food-crisis
Food-culture
Food-deserts
Food-guide
Food-Inc
Food-industry
Food-industry-regulation
Food-magazines
Food-marketing
Food-miles
Food-movement
Food-policy
Food-quality
Food-safety
Food-security
Food-stamps
Food-studies
Food-supply
Food-systems
Food-trade
Food-waste
FOP(Front-of-Package)Labels
Fortification
Framingham-Heart-Study
Fruits-and-vegetables
FTC (Federal Trade Commission)
Functional-foods
Futures-markets
GAO
GAO(Government Accountability Office)
Gardens
Gary-Taubes
General-Mills
Gluten
GM(Genetically Modified)
GMA(Grocery Manufacturers Association)
Grassfed
Green-food
HACCP(Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point)
Hannaford
Health-aura
Health-claims
Health-statistics
Heart-disease
HFCS (High Fructose Corn Syrup)
HHS(Department of Health and Human Services)
Hormones
Hugo drinks
Hydroponics
hyperactivity
IASO
India
Infant-formula
International
Interviews
IOM (Institute of Medicine)
iraq
Irradiation
IWG(Interagency Working Group)
Jamie-Oliver
Japan
Job-Ads
Joy-of-Cooking
Juice-drinks
juices
Junk food
Kellogg
Kelly-Brownell
KFC
Kids' diets
King-Corn
Korea
Kraft
krill
Label-scoring-systems
Labels
Lawsuits
Legislation
Let's Move!
Listeria
Lobbies
Local-food
Lévi-Strauss
Mad-cow-disease
Malnutrition
Manure
maps
Margarines
Marketing to kids
Mark Hegsted
Mars
McDonald's
meal frequency
Meat
Meat safety
Meat substitutes
media
Melamine
Mercury
Michael-Pollan
Michael-Taylor
military
Milk
Monsanto
Movies
MSG
MyPlate
Nanotechnology
Natural
neighborhoods
Nestlé
New-York-City
New-Zealand
Niman
Nutrient-availability
Nutrition-education
Nutrition-standards
Nutritionism
Obama
Obesity
Obesity-in-kids
Obesity-policy
Omega-3-fats
Organic-fish
Organic-standards
Organics
orthorexia
Oysters
Pakistan
Partnerships
Patents
Paula Deen
Peanut-butter
Peanuts
PepsiCo
personal responsibility
Pesticides
Peter Jennings
Pet food
Phil Lempert
Photos
Pistachios
pizza
Pork
Portion sizes
Potatoes
pregnancy
Pric
Price-fixing
Price-of-food
Probiotics
Processing
Protein
Public-health
Pyramid
Quotes from What to Eat
Radioactivity
Raw-foods
Raw-milk
rBGH
recipes
Red-Bull
Research
Restaurants
Revolving-door
Right-to-food
Rosa DeLauro
RWJ Foundation
S.510
Salmonella
Salt
San-Francisco-Chronicle
scho
School-food
Seeds
shrek
Single-food-agency
Slow Food
Smart Choices
Snack foods
Socioeconomic-factors
Soft drinks
soy
Spinach
Splenda
Sprouts
Starvation
Stevia
sticky
Sugar
Supermarkets
Supplements
Supreme court
Surveys
sushi
Sweeteners
Swine flu
Taste
Taxes
Techno-foods
Television
Thomas Friedan
Tim Lang
Tobacco
Tomatoes
Toxins
Trans-fat
Tufts
Twitter
Tyson-foods
United Nations
Urban-farming
USDA
Vegetables
Vegetarian-and-vegan
Vending-machines
Videos
Vitamin-water
Vitamins
Wall-Street
Walmart
Water
WHO(World Health Organization)
Whole Foods
Whole grains
WIC
World hunger
Yearly Kos
Yogurt

Comments
I can’t help but wonder if the current peanut butter crisis hasn’t played a role in GMA’s announcement. Only a few minutes ago, I read a Reuter’s story which stated that organic food sales – while growing at a dramatically slower pace as opposed to a year ago – are still growing. If food manufacturers are smart, they’re starting to realize there’s little room for growth if people are too terrified to purchase their goods.
Giving the FDA more responsibility would also give the GMA and other food distributors yet another way to share the blame when unsafe food is inevitably found again. If the past is an indication of government food regulation efficiency, the FDA would not be able to consistently monitor everyone to ensure safety.
Stronger FDA regulations are probably desirable, but implementing them will be challenging.
I agree with Ansley, this is just a way for the GMA and other trade organizations to do some great PR and push the blame. The more stringent restrictions would not impact them as much as it would the food industry. However any lobbying effort to make food safety regulation stricter, on the behalf of the distributers is going to help as long as they don’t back down from this position after the food industry throws a fit over it all.
Implementing the stricter regulations at the current status quo would be a challenge however if more funding and power was given to both the FDA and USDA then the problem wouldn’t be implementation anymore but rather making sure that the regulations were actually sound and not influenced by the food industry. When the food pyramid was first created it was suppose to showcase sound nutrition, and look at what it is today and how it’s implemented. Implementation is only half the problem when the regulations that you have are not in the best interest of the American public, but rather the factory farms and major food production conglomerates (i.e. Monsanto, Cargo, ConAgra, etc.) that control the entire food industry as well as the nutritional value and overall safety of the food that ends up on our plates.
Yes it would be lovely if the FDA could do this job – but more regulation will end up hurting the small local producers. In fact this is one method the large corporations have used to keep small producers (who are not likely to be the problem) down. What we need is a decentralized food system. A local based, small scale system. We need to set up our incentive structure and regulations to support the small producers. There is much less likely to be contamination in small scale operations – and when there is it affects fewer products and people.