<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Michael Taylor appointed to FDA: A good choice!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/07/michael-taylor-appointed-to-fda-a-good-choice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/07/michael-taylor-appointed-to-fda-a-good-choice/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:07:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Obama Screwed the Pooch with Taylor &#124; feastcraft</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/07/michael-taylor-appointed-to-fda-a-good-choice/comment-page-2/#comment-213166</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Obama Screwed the Pooch with Taylor &#124; feastcraft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 04:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=1434#comment-213166</guid>
		<description>[...] and while the USDA Food Safety guy he swung big words but implemented scarcely any actual changes, despite Marion Nestle&#8217;s blog claiming the opposite a few years [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and while the USDA Food Safety guy he swung big words but implemented scarcely any actual changes, despite Marion Nestle&#8217;s blog claiming the opposite a few years [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monsanto’s man Taylor returns to FDA in food-czar role &#124; Grist &#124; WorldWright&#039;s &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/07/michael-taylor-appointed-to-fda-a-good-choice/comment-page-2/#comment-212996</link>
		<dc:creator>Monsanto’s man Taylor returns to FDA in food-czar role &#124; Grist &#124; WorldWright&#039;s &#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 23:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=1434#comment-212996</guid>
		<description>[...] the road to Damascus: the one-time company man suddenly became a valorous industry watchdog. In a surprising blog post Tuesday, Nestle declared Taylor “a good pick” for the FDA. “I say this in full knowledge of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the road to Damascus: the one-time company man suddenly became a valorous industry watchdog. In a surprising blog post Tuesday, Nestle declared Taylor “a good pick” for the FDA. “I say this in full knowledge of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dwan Savoie</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/07/michael-taylor-appointed-to-fda-a-good-choice/comment-page-2/#comment-205589</link>
		<dc:creator>Dwan Savoie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 03:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=1434#comment-205589</guid>
		<description>You think it&#039;s a good choice?!  Well, when everyone is sterile from eating gmo crops for the next 30 years, maybe you&#039;ll think back to this day and change your mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You think it&#8217;s a good choice?!  Well, when everyone is sterile from eating gmo crops for the next 30 years, maybe you&#8217;ll think back to this day and change your mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fast-tracked Food Safety</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/07/michael-taylor-appointed-to-fda-a-good-choice/comment-page-2/#comment-101842</link>
		<dc:creator>Fast-tracked Food Safety</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 22:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=1434#comment-101842</guid>
		<description>[...] on the appointment: one for, and one against. Nutritionist and food politics writer Marion Nestle argued on her website that the Taylor choice was a good one, given his history with strong food safety regulations. Tom [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on the appointment: one for, and one against. Nutritionist and food politics writer Marion Nestle argued on her website that the Taylor choice was a good one, given his history with strong food safety regulations. Tom [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Dees &#8211; GMO &#124; BURNING BABYLON</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/07/michael-taylor-appointed-to-fda-a-good-choice/comment-page-1/#comment-48960</link>
		<dc:creator>David Dees &#8211; GMO &#124; BURNING BABYLON</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Dec 2010 20:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=1434#comment-48960</guid>
		<description>[...] the road to Damascus: the one-time company man suddenly became a valorous industry watchdog. In a surprising blog post Tuesday, Nestle declared Taylor &#8220;a good pick&#8221; for the FDA. &#8220;I say this in full [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the road to Damascus: the one-time company man suddenly became a valorous industry watchdog. In a surprising blog post Tuesday, Nestle declared Taylor &#8220;a good pick&#8221; for the FDA. &#8220;I say this in full [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa Lopez</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/07/michael-taylor-appointed-to-fda-a-good-choice/comment-page-1/#comment-46163</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Lopez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 09:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=1434#comment-46163</guid>
		<description>I still can&#039;t believe this article by Marion Nestle.  Is it for real?  Given Taylor&#039;s history and past &quot;affiliations&quot; I will NEVER trust the man!  I can only thank him for his part in helping to make this world a scarier place to live in, and all for what?  MONEY, of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still can&#8217;t believe this article by Marion Nestle.  Is it for real?  Given Taylor&#8217;s history and past &#8220;affiliations&#8221; I will NEVER trust the man!  I can only thank him for his part in helping to make this world a scarier place to live in, and all for what?  MONEY, of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Association of Public Health Laboratories - APHL Public Health LabLog</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/07/michael-taylor-appointed-to-fda-a-good-choice/comment-page-1/#comment-44789</link>
		<dc:creator>Association of Public Health Laboratories - APHL Public Health LabLog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 17:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=1434#comment-44789</guid>
		<description>[...] nutritionist Marion Nestle, a professor at New York University, considers Taylor a good choice. She points out that as head of the USDA Food Safety and Inspection Service, he required [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] nutritionist Marion Nestle, a professor at New York University, considers Taylor a good choice. She points out that as head of the USDA Food Safety and Inspection Service, he required [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MeatScience</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/07/michael-taylor-appointed-to-fda-a-good-choice/comment-page-1/#comment-40756</link>
		<dc:creator>MeatScience</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 21:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=1434#comment-40756</guid>
		<description>I realize this post is a little old, but I have a comment referring to Cathy Richads post:

I agree that one’s associations don’t define one’s principles. However, they do colour them. Hopefully this appointment is as positive as you have hypothesized.

However, the HAACP rules for the meat industry have done little to prevent outbreaks and recalls, even though they’ve facilitated recalls. What HAACP has done is hurt the small ranchers. In British Columbia our new meat regulations (HAACP based) have meant that people raising a few cattle on the side simply can no longer afford to do so — they can give away the meat, but they can’t sell it unless it’s processed in an approved slaughterhouse — and those are few and far between in our very large geographical area. Most have decided to sell their stock to mega ranchers. The days of local butchers and knowing where your meat comes from is virtually gone, with the exception of a few incredibly dedicated ranchers. It’s all mass market now.

HAACP is a great idea that in its application has gone bad.&quot;

It&#039;s HACCP not HAACP. At least get the acronym right even if your facts aren&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I realize this post is a little old, but I have a comment referring to Cathy Richads post:</p>
<p>I agree that one’s associations don’t define one’s principles. However, they do colour them. Hopefully this appointment is as positive as you have hypothesized.</p>
<p>However, the HAACP rules for the meat industry have done little to prevent outbreaks and recalls, even though they’ve facilitated recalls. What HAACP has done is hurt the small ranchers. In British Columbia our new meat regulations (HAACP based) have meant that people raising a few cattle on the side simply can no longer afford to do so — they can give away the meat, but they can’t sell it unless it’s processed in an approved slaughterhouse — and those are few and far between in our very large geographical area. Most have decided to sell their stock to mega ranchers. The days of local butchers and knowing where your meat comes from is virtually gone, with the exception of a few incredibly dedicated ranchers. It’s all mass market now.</p>
<p>HAACP is a great idea that in its application has gone bad.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s HACCP not HAACP. At least get the acronym right even if your facts aren&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Genetic breakthrough could let fruit last a month longer. Safe? Bah. Who cares? &#171; Xenophilia (True Strange Stuff)</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/07/michael-taylor-appointed-to-fda-a-good-choice/comment-page-1/#comment-35241</link>
		<dc:creator>Genetic breakthrough could let fruit last a month longer. Safe? Bah. Who cares? &#171; Xenophilia (True Strange Stuff)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 05:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=1434#comment-35241</guid>
		<description>[...] little doubt that Taylor is an expert in both food safety and food regulation. Even his critics will grant that. He once ran the USDA’s food safety program and has spent years studying the issue. Taylor says [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] little doubt that Taylor is an expert in both food safety and food regulation. Even his critics will grant that. He once ran the USDA’s food safety program and has spent years studying the issue. Taylor says [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: History, HACCP and the Food Safety Con Job &#124; Farm Wars</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/07/michael-taylor-appointed-to-fda-a-good-choice/comment-page-1/#comment-32105</link>
		<dc:creator>History, HACCP and the Food Safety Con Job &#124; Farm Wars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 22:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=1434#comment-32105</guid>
		<description>[...] Marion Nestle&#8217;s blog Food Politics “Michael Taylor appointed to FDA: A good choice!” July 7, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Marion Nestle&#8217;s blog Food Politics “Michael Taylor appointed to FDA: A good choice!” July 7, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

