<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hormones in the food supply</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/08/hormones-in-the-food-supply/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/08/hormones-in-the-food-supply/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:17:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cathy Richards</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/08/hormones-in-the-food-supply/comment-page-1/#comment-31114</link>
		<dc:creator>Cathy Richards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 19:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=1532#comment-31114</guid>
		<description>Danny,
It affects your sperm -- not very noticeable without a microscope or DNA analyzer, but maybe you care about them anyway. And if your baby is gestating in a woman exposed to BPA there&#039;s a risk that a male fetus will be feminized both behaviourly and genitally, and all babies born with in-utero BPA exposure will be at risk for behaviour problems.

Then there&#039;s cancer risk. If you are careful when you interact with other risk factors (like wearing a mask when you sand your drywall, or wearing a seat belt), it makes sense you should be careful with BPA and other contaminants that act like hormones.

You can&#039;t see asbestos fibres either, and feel when when you&#039;re first exposed to them, and 2nd, and 3rd exposures etc. Doesn&#039;t mean it&#039;s harmless.

If they can make plastics without BPA (and they can) then they should. Here&#039;s one change you can make: buy your beer in bottles, not in cans (which are lined with BPA plastic).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Danny,<br />
It affects your sperm &#8212; not very noticeable without a microscope or DNA analyzer, but maybe you care about them anyway. And if your baby is gestating in a woman exposed to BPA there&#8217;s a risk that a male fetus will be feminized both behaviourly and genitally, and all babies born with in-utero BPA exposure will be at risk for behaviour problems.</p>
<p>Then there&#8217;s cancer risk. If you are careful when you interact with other risk factors (like wearing a mask when you sand your drywall, or wearing a seat belt), it makes sense you should be careful with BPA and other contaminants that act like hormones.</p>
<p>You can&#8217;t see asbestos fibres either, and feel when when you&#8217;re first exposed to them, and 2nd, and 3rd exposures etc. Doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s harmless.</p>
<p>If they can make plastics without BPA (and they can) then they should. Here&#8217;s one change you can make: buy your beer in bottles, not in cans (which are lined with BPA plastic).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/08/hormones-in-the-food-supply/comment-page-1/#comment-31113</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 19:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=1532#comment-31113</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s the one thing that really is a hole in the logic for the people who don&#039;t like hormones. What exactly does it do to me that&#039;s so bad?  I feel fine eating whatever the hell I eat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s the one thing that really is a hole in the logic for the people who don&#8217;t like hormones. What exactly does it do to me that&#8217;s so bad?  I feel fine eating whatever the hell I eat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

