<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Smart Choices: 44% sugar calories!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/08/smart-choices-44-sugar-calories/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/08/smart-choices-44-sugar-calories/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 00:09:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Smart Choices &#171; NotionsCapital</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/08/smart-choices-44-sugar-calories/comment-page-1/#comment-32558</link>
		<dc:creator>Smart Choices &#171; NotionsCapital</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 15:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=1513#comment-32558</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;Smart Choices: 44% sugar calories!&#8221; Marion Nestle, Food Politics [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;Smart Choices: 44% sugar calories!&#8221; Marion Nestle, Food Politics [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nutrition Rating Systems &#8211; the problem and a solution : Foodessentials</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/08/smart-choices-44-sugar-calories/comment-page-1/#comment-32537</link>
		<dc:creator>Nutrition Rating Systems &#8211; the problem and a solution : Foodessentials</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 09:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=1513#comment-32537</guid>
		<description>[...] There has been a lot of attention given to nutrition rating systems of late, fueled by the launch of the controversial Smart Choices rating system.  The controversy of the smart choices program, in brief,  is that the criteria for what gets labelled a ¨smart choice¨ seem somewhat flimsy.  For instance Marion Nestle examines the ¨smart choice¨ Froot Loops in this post here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There has been a lot of attention given to nutrition rating systems of late, fueled by the launch of the controversial Smart Choices rating system.  The controversy of the smart choices program, in brief,  is that the criteria for what gets labelled a ¨smart choice¨ seem somewhat flimsy.  For instance Marion Nestle examines the ¨smart choice¨ Froot Loops in this post here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa Berkelhammer</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/08/smart-choices-44-sugar-calories/comment-page-1/#comment-31874</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Berkelhammer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 17:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=1513#comment-31874</guid>
		<description>The food industry is no friend to health.  Go to the produce aisle please everyone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The food industry is no friend to health.  Go to the produce aisle please everyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SharpNews Everyday&#8230; &#187; Marion Nestle: Kellogg&#8217;s asks for a Froot Loops correction. More on Smart (?) Choices</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/08/smart-choices-44-sugar-calories/comment-page-1/#comment-31830</link>
		<dc:creator>SharpNews Everyday&#8230; &#187; Marion Nestle: Kellogg&#8217;s asks for a Froot Loops correction. More on Smart (?) Choices</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 22:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=1513#comment-31830</guid>
		<description>[...] had seen my previous blog post on the Smart Choices program, and wanted me to know that Froot Loops has been reformulated to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] had seen my previous blog post on the Smart Choices program, and wanted me to know that Froot Loops has been reformulated to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marion Nestle: Kellogg&#8217;s asks for a Froot Loops correction. More on Smart (?) Choices &#124; DoisPontoZero</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/08/smart-choices-44-sugar-calories/comment-page-1/#comment-31828</link>
		<dc:creator>Marion Nestle: Kellogg&#8217;s asks for a Froot Loops correction. More on Smart (?) Choices &#124; DoisPontoZero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 21:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=1513#comment-31828</guid>
		<description>[...] had seen my previous blog post on the Smart Choices program, and wanted me to know that Froot Loops has been reformulated to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] had seen my previous blog post on the Smart Choices program, and wanted me to know that Froot Loops has been reformulated to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davidk</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/08/smart-choices-44-sugar-calories/comment-page-1/#comment-31807</link>
		<dc:creator>davidk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 16:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=1513#comment-31807</guid>
		<description>All 203 cereals on the &quot;Smart Choices&quot; list are produced by three companies: General Mills, Kelloggs, and Quaker.

What does that tell you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All 203 cereals on the &#8220;Smart Choices&#8221; list are produced by three companies: General Mills, Kelloggs, and Quaker.</p>
<p>What does that tell you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobby</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/08/smart-choices-44-sugar-calories/comment-page-1/#comment-30932</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 20:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=1513#comment-30932</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m waiting for organic froot loops... that&#039;ll confuse the shoppers. &quot;mommy, mommy it&#039;s organic, mommy mommy it&#039;s organic...&quot;&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m waiting for organic froot loops&#8230; that&#8217;ll confuse the shoppers. &#8220;mommy, mommy it&#8217;s organic, mommy mommy it&#8217;s organic&#8230;&#8221;"</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/08/smart-choices-44-sugar-calories/comment-page-1/#comment-30914</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 17:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=1513#comment-30914</guid>
		<description>Outrageous and upsetting. As the parent of three sugar-sensitive children, I&#039;m more and more inclined to just make everything myself. They have developed progressive allergies over the years and I&#039;m convinced, anectodally, that the root of the allergies are due to this kind of stuff that&#039;s added to almost all mass produced/marketed products. Thanks for the alert on this!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Outrageous and upsetting. As the parent of three sugar-sensitive children, I&#8217;m more and more inclined to just make everything myself. They have developed progressive allergies over the years and I&#8217;m convinced, anectodally, that the root of the allergies are due to this kind of stuff that&#8217;s added to almost all mass produced/marketed products. Thanks for the alert on this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janet</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/08/smart-choices-44-sugar-calories/comment-page-1/#comment-30904</link>
		<dc:creator>Janet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=1513#comment-30904</guid>
		<description>One look at the ingredients list- sugar, trans fat, artificial colors and flavors,  and BHT tells that this should not be consumed by anyone, let alone be a &quot;Smart Choice&quot;. 
 The American Society of Nutrition should be pushing for real food, not processed junk. This whole thing is very sad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One look at the ingredients list- sugar, trans fat, artificial colors and flavors,  and BHT tells that this should not be consumed by anyone, let alone be a &#8220;Smart Choice&#8221;.<br />
 The American Society of Nutrition should be pushing for real food, not processed junk. This whole thing is very sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daddy, Papa and Me &#187; Emma, this is why we don&#8217;t buy Fruitloops</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/08/smart-choices-44-sugar-calories/comment-page-1/#comment-30857</link>
		<dc:creator>Daddy, Papa and Me &#187; Emma, this is why we don&#8217;t buy Fruitloops</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 22:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=1513#comment-30857</guid>
		<description>[...] Choice-marked Fruit Loops with 1/2 cup nonfat milk, the one that Marion Nestle writes about here: Food Politics » Smart Choices: 44% sugar calories! and I&#8217;ll give our breakfast the disadvantage of going organic. So when Emma gets older and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Choice-marked Fruit Loops with 1/2 cup nonfat milk, the one that Marion Nestle writes about here: Food Politics » Smart Choices: 44% sugar calories! and I&#8217;ll give our breakfast the disadvantage of going organic. So when Emma gets older and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
