<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Not-So-Smart Choices story continues&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/09/the-not-so-smart-choices-story-continues/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/09/the-not-so-smart-choices-story-continues/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:20:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: robyn webb</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/09/the-not-so-smart-choices-story-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-32600</link>
		<dc:creator>robyn webb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 22:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=1612#comment-32600</guid>
		<description>As a nutritionist I am concerned about the Smart Choice program. With todays profusion of misinformation about nutrition (my biggest pet peeve the: Eat This, Not That books)when a program with an authoritative sounding name puts a blessing on food that is junk, people will have one more justification for eating these foods.

The problem with this whole thing is that it dismisses just using common sense; a trait everyone has but come to rely too much on sensationalism to verify any uncertainty</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a nutritionist I am concerned about the Smart Choice program. With todays profusion of misinformation about nutrition (my biggest pet peeve the: Eat This, Not That books)when a program with an authoritative sounding name puts a blessing on food that is junk, people will have one more justification for eating these foods.</p>
<p>The problem with this whole thing is that it dismisses just using common sense; a trait everyone has but come to rely too much on sensationalism to verify any uncertainty</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel  K. Ithaca, NY</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/09/the-not-so-smart-choices-story-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-32598</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel  K. Ithaca, NY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=1612#comment-32598</guid>
		<description>Good point:
     &quot;there are alternatives to packaged and processed food and that 
     one need not even have special training in order to use them.&quot;
Fruit is an easy one.

Michelle, yes we should use some common sense and when nutrition professionals/etc. see a program that portrays to have consumers&#039; health as their main concern, but really are attempting to persuade people to push more product--highly processed products especially, it is only right to challenge this deception. People are already confused enough about What To Eat. Doing what is right is common sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point:<br />
     &#8220;there are alternatives to packaged and processed food and that<br />
     one need not even have special training in order to use them.&#8221;<br />
Fruit is an easy one.</p>
<p>Michelle, yes we should use some common sense and when nutrition professionals/etc. see a program that portrays to have consumers&#8217; health as their main concern, but really are attempting to persuade people to push more product&#8211;highly processed products especially, it is only right to challenge this deception. People are already confused enough about What To Eat. Doing what is right is common sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel  K. Ithaca, NY</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/09/the-not-so-smart-choices-story-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-32597</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel  K. Ithaca, NY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=1612#comment-32597</guid>
		<description>Froot Loops not healthy? Not a Smart Choice? What do you mean?
Well if they didn&#039;t have so much dye in them. Or so much added refined sugar. Or so much highly refined wheat powder.
So what exactly IS healthy about Froot Loops? If you take out those things what is left? a sprinkle of vitamins?
Oh and it also has Trans Fat--which needs to be removed from GRAS, generally recognized as safe, since it isn&#039;t. Trans Fat is toxic.

An easy benchmark for this program would be no food could qualify if it contains PARTIALLY HYDROGENATED VEGETABLE OIL aka Trans Fat. The safe amount for humans is 0 grams. There are many reasons why this program displays that it is not created for people&#039;s health, but to promote product, but including any food that has added Trans Fat is just insane.
People&#039;s health over Corporate Wealth already!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Froot Loops not healthy? Not a Smart Choice? What do you mean?<br />
Well if they didn&#8217;t have so much dye in them. Or so much added refined sugar. Or so much highly refined wheat powder.<br />
So what exactly IS healthy about Froot Loops? If you take out those things what is left? a sprinkle of vitamins?<br />
Oh and it also has Trans Fat&#8211;which needs to be removed from GRAS, generally recognized as safe, since it isn&#8217;t. Trans Fat is toxic.</p>
<p>An easy benchmark for this program would be no food could qualify if it contains PARTIALLY HYDROGENATED VEGETABLE OIL aka Trans Fat. The safe amount for humans is 0 grams. There are many reasons why this program displays that it is not created for people&#8217;s health, but to promote product, but including any food that has added Trans Fat is just insane.<br />
People&#8217;s health over Corporate Wealth already!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle @ Find Your Balance</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/09/the-not-so-smart-choices-story-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-32595</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle @ Find Your Balance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 23:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=1612#comment-32595</guid>
		<description>Companies do get what they pay for. Let&#039;s all just use some common sense, shall we?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Companies do get what they pay for. Let&#8217;s all just use some common sense, shall we?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janet Camp</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/09/the-not-so-smart-choices-story-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-32591</link>
		<dc:creator>Janet Camp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 04:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=1612#comment-32591</guid>
		<description>Dr. Kennedy&#039;s letter fails to clarify her &quot;grossly misquoted&quot; remarks from the NY Times article. Neither does she give much of a defense for her involvement in this fiasco of a program. The letter is a lot of spin and not much substance--kind of like Froot Loops.

Ms. Tharalson: I share your dismay at the lack of basic food knowledge/preparation skills and am encouraged to hear that you are involved in redressing this issue. I post here frequently about common sense solutions to many of the topics that come up. I fear that readers will find me tiresome, but your post convinces me that it is necessary to let a younger generation know that there are alternatives to packaged and processed food and that one need not even have special training in order to use them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr. Kennedy&#8217;s letter fails to clarify her &#8220;grossly misquoted&#8221; remarks from the NY Times article. Neither does she give much of a defense for her involvement in this fiasco of a program. The letter is a lot of spin and not much substance&#8211;kind of like Froot Loops.</p>
<p>Ms. Tharalson: I share your dismay at the lack of basic food knowledge/preparation skills and am encouraged to hear that you are involved in redressing this issue. I post here frequently about common sense solutions to many of the topics that come up. I fear that readers will find me tiresome, but your post convinces me that it is necessary to let a younger generation know that there are alternatives to packaged and processed food and that one need not even have special training in order to use them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie Tharalson, RD</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/09/the-not-so-smart-choices-story-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-32588</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie Tharalson, RD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 00:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=1612#comment-32588</guid>
		<description>I agree wholeheartedly that the Smart Choices program needs to go away. There is no amount of research that will convince me that Froot Loops are health food. Research and &quot;Big Food&quot; are generally not good bedfellows and this situation illustrates very clearly why. 

However, I suppose what resonates with me the most about this is that it showcases the big bucks that are made simply because millions of Americans are unable or unwilling to cook for themselves. Certainly lack of time is a factor, but as a Registered Dietitian with formal culinary training, I see a lack of basic cooking and food identification skills as a major stumbling block as well. My work involves filling in this knowledge gap...gaps that are sometimes rather shocking. 
Unfortunately as long as these conditions exist, I don&#039;t see reliance on processed convenience foods going away. The very least we can do as responsible nutritionists is to avoid bestowing credibility on something that is so deeply flawed from a common sense standpoint.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree wholeheartedly that the Smart Choices program needs to go away. There is no amount of research that will convince me that Froot Loops are health food. Research and &#8220;Big Food&#8221; are generally not good bedfellows and this situation illustrates very clearly why. </p>
<p>However, I suppose what resonates with me the most about this is that it showcases the big bucks that are made simply because millions of Americans are unable or unwilling to cook for themselves. Certainly lack of time is a factor, but as a Registered Dietitian with formal culinary training, I see a lack of basic cooking and food identification skills as a major stumbling block as well. My work involves filling in this knowledge gap&#8230;gaps that are sometimes rather shocking.<br />
Unfortunately as long as these conditions exist, I don&#8217;t see reliance on processed convenience foods going away. The very least we can do as responsible nutritionists is to avoid bestowing credibility on something that is so deeply flawed from a common sense standpoint.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nutrition School Dean Defends &#8220;Smart Choices&#8221; [Nutrition Labels] &#124; Fooducate</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/09/the-not-so-smart-choices-story-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-32585</link>
		<dc:creator>Nutrition School Dean Defends &#8220;Smart Choices&#8221; [Nutrition Labels] &#124; Fooducate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 18:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=1612#comment-32585</guid>
		<description>[...] a letter to her alumni, Dr. Kennedy makes the case for Smart Choices by pointing to 3 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a letter to her alumni, Dr. Kennedy makes the case for Smart Choices by pointing to 3 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: meatlessmama</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/09/the-not-so-smart-choices-story-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-32584</link>
		<dc:creator>meatlessmama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 18:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=1612#comment-32584</guid>
		<description>&quot;It&#039;s pracitically spinach&quot;, priceless!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s pracitically spinach&#8221;, priceless!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

