<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Smart Choices suspended!  May it rest in peace.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/10/smart-choices-suspended/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/10/smart-choices-suspended/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 21:22:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Janet Guss (Darwich)</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/10/smart-choices-suspended/comment-page-1/#comment-32972</link>
		<dc:creator>Janet Guss (Darwich)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 18:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=1676#comment-32972</guid>
		<description>Hello Marion-

WHAT-A-COUP!! And to think, you could have been on their &quot;advisory board&quot;!

Today ...Smart Choices; Tomorrow... NABISCO (and those AD agencies who do their bidding)!

Hope all&#039;s well on the Best Coast... from rainy Portland&#039;s Left Coast,
-Janet Guss</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Marion-</p>
<p>WHAT-A-COUP!! And to think, you could have been on their &#8220;advisory board&#8221;!</p>
<p>Today &#8230;Smart Choices; Tomorrow&#8230; NABISCO (and those AD agencies who do their bidding)!</p>
<p>Hope all&#8217;s well on the Best Coast&#8230; from rainy Portland&#8217;s Left Coast,<br />
-Janet Guss</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top 10 Links of the Week: 10/23/09 – 10/29/09 &#124; Weight Loss Archive</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/10/smart-choices-suspended/comment-page-1/#comment-32944</link>
		<dc:creator>Top 10 Links of the Week: 10/23/09 – 10/29/09 &#124; Weight Loss Archive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 04:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=1676#comment-32944</guid>
		<description>[...]  Food Politics: Smart Choices Suspended Last week, it was in trouble. This week, Smart Choices is kaput. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Food Politics: Smart Choices Suspended Last week, it was in trouble. This week, Smart Choices is kaput. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: For The Love of Food &#124; Healthy Eating Tips - Upgrade Your Healthstyle &#124; Summer Tomato</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/10/smart-choices-suspended/comment-page-1/#comment-32936</link>
		<dc:creator>For The Love of Food &#124; Healthy Eating Tips - Upgrade Your Healthstyle &#124; Summer Tomato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 13:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=1676#comment-32936</guid>
		<description>[...] Smart Choices suspended! May it rest in peace. &lt;&lt;Nuf said. (Food Politics) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Smart Choices suspended! May it rest in peace. &lt;&lt;Nuf said. (Food Politics) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top 10 Links of the Week: 10/23/09 – 10/29/09 &#124; Nutrition Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/10/smart-choices-suspended/comment-page-1/#comment-32934</link>
		<dc:creator>Top 10 Links of the Week: 10/23/09 – 10/29/09 &#124; Nutrition Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 11:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=1676#comment-32934</guid>
		<description>[...]  Food Politics: Smart Choices Suspended Last week, it was in trouble. This week, Smart Choices is kaput. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Food Politics: Smart Choices Suspended Last week, it was in trouble. This week, Smart Choices is kaput. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/10/smart-choices-suspended/comment-page-1/#comment-32915</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=1676#comment-32915</guid>
		<description>I just want to join in applauding Marion for bringing awareness to this issue concerning the Smart Choices program and encouraging dialogue about food labeling and health claims in a broad sense.  The suspension of Smart Choices is a step in the right direction and I do not want to take away from this huge victory, but the battle is not over until we see what standardized criteria the FDA comes up with.  The FDA is in a great position right now to make some much-needed changes to front-of-package labeling and create a system based on sound nutrition science and common sense that actually helps Americans make not only better, but also truly healthy, food choices. Let&#039;s hope the FDA delivers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just want to join in applauding Marion for bringing awareness to this issue concerning the Smart Choices program and encouraging dialogue about food labeling and health claims in a broad sense.  The suspension of Smart Choices is a step in the right direction and I do not want to take away from this huge victory, but the battle is not over until we see what standardized criteria the FDA comes up with.  The FDA is in a great position right now to make some much-needed changes to front-of-package labeling and create a system based on sound nutrition science and common sense that actually helps Americans make not only better, but also truly healthy, food choices. Let&#8217;s hope the FDA delivers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Douglas &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Food Politics/ Big Food, by Shelley Lance, Blog Editor</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/10/smart-choices-suspended/comment-page-1/#comment-32908</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Douglas &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Food Politics/ Big Food, by Shelley Lance, Blog Editor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=1676#comment-32908</guid>
		<description>[...] post on nutrition expert Marion Nestle&#8217;s blog, Food Politics (you can find this under &#8220;Blog [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] post on nutrition expert Marion Nestle&#8217;s blog, Food Politics (you can find this under &#8220;Blog [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: My Pure Diet. Health News &#38; Supplements.</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/10/smart-choices-suspended/comment-page-1/#comment-32897</link>
		<dc:creator>My Pure Diet. Health News &#38; Supplements.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=1676#comment-32897</guid>
		<description>[...] it&#039;s celebration time at sundry food and nutrition blogs, including the &quot;Food Politics&quot; blog of New York University professor Marion Nestle. &quot;Who says the FDA does not have any [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it&#39;s celebration time at sundry food and nutrition blogs, including the &quot;Food Politics&quot; blog of New York University professor Marion Nestle. &quot;Who says the FDA does not have any [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthro</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/10/smart-choices-suspended/comment-page-1/#comment-32880</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 02:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=1676#comment-32880</guid>
		<description>Yay! Thanks Marion, for keeping up with this and for not getting involved with this group&#039;s shenanigans.

I would echo Jill&#039;s concern. The way the FDA statement is worded, the door seems wide open for lots of compromising.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yay! Thanks Marion, for keeping up with this and for not getting involved with this group&#8217;s shenanigans.</p>
<p>I would echo Jill&#8217;s concern. The way the FDA statement is worded, the door seems wide open for lots of compromising.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/10/smart-choices-suspended/comment-page-1/#comment-32876</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 15:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=1676#comment-32876</guid>
		<description>Marion you are too modest not to take at least a modicum of credit for publicizing and exposing this entire scandalous labeling story in the first place!  Nice work. 

Dan
&lt;a href=&quot;http://casualkitchen.blogspot.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Casual Kitchen&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marion you are too modest not to take at least a modicum of credit for publicizing and exposing this entire scandalous labeling story in the first place!  Nice work. </p>
<p>Dan<br />
<a href="http://casualkitchen.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">Casual Kitchen</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel K.   Ithaca, NY</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/10/smart-choices-suspended/comment-page-1/#comment-32872</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel K.   Ithaca, NY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 05:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=1676#comment-32872</guid>
		<description>Now if we can end the ridiculousness of the sugar-sweetened, highly processed, whole-grain-added commercials of &quot;Honey&quot; Nut Cheerios claiming that &quot;You&#039;ll Love Lowering Your Cholesterol&quot;, we would be much better off. Lower your cholesterol by a fraction of a point, but raises your triglycerides.

Why are disease-related claims allowed on foods? We know that the companies that can afford to print the labels to display such malarkey are manufacturers who have &quot;added value&quot; (i.e. removed the fresh-wholesomeness from which this food-like-product came) to a highly processed food. 
The kale and the blueberries sit silently in the market. When it comes to protecting your health, you better watch out (and include mostly) those quiet ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now if we can end the ridiculousness of the sugar-sweetened, highly processed, whole-grain-added commercials of &#8220;Honey&#8221; Nut Cheerios claiming that &#8220;You&#8217;ll Love Lowering Your Cholesterol&#8221;, we would be much better off. Lower your cholesterol by a fraction of a point, but raises your triglycerides.</p>
<p>Why are disease-related claims allowed on foods? We know that the companies that can afford to print the labels to display such malarkey are manufacturers who have &#8220;added value&#8221; (i.e. removed the fresh-wholesomeness from which this food-like-product came) to a highly processed food.<br />
The kale and the blueberries sit silently in the market. When it comes to protecting your health, you better watch out (and include mostly) those quiet ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
