<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The soft drink industry strikes back</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/10/the-soft-drink-industry-strikes-back/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/10/the-soft-drink-industry-strikes-back/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:20:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Soda Wants to Keep America Fat: Here&#8217;s How to Fight Back &#171; The Oldspeak Journal</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/10/the-soft-drink-industry-strikes-back/comment-page-1/#comment-37945</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Soda Wants to Keep America Fat: Here&#8217;s How to Fight Back &#171; The Oldspeak Journal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 May 2010 20:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=1618#comment-37945</guid>
		<description>[...] the Center for Consumer Freedom &#8212; front group number-two &#8212; has plastered the city with adsthat ask: &#8220;Big Apple or Big [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the Center for Consumer Freedom &#8212; front group number-two &#8212; has plastered the city with adsthat ask: &#8220;Big Apple or Big [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shut Up, Give Us Money, And Stay FAT! &#171; It&#39;s Better Now</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/10/the-soft-drink-industry-strikes-back/comment-page-1/#comment-37896</link>
		<dc:creator>Shut Up, Give Us Money, And Stay FAT! &#171; It&#39;s Better Now</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 16:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=1618#comment-37896</guid>
		<description>[...] the Center for Consumer Freedom &#8212; front group number-two &#8211; has plastered the city with ads that ask: &#8220;Big Apple or Big [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the Center for Consumer Freedom &#8212; front group number-two &#8211; has plastered the city with ads that ask: &#8220;Big Apple or Big [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Essie</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/10/the-soft-drink-industry-strikes-back/comment-page-1/#comment-32664</link>
		<dc:creator>Essie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 13:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=1618#comment-32664</guid>
		<description>Berman is scheduled to apppear on Rachel Maddow&#039;s show sometime this week. Can&#039;t wait to see that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Berman is scheduled to apppear on Rachel Maddow&#8217;s show sometime this week. Can&#8217;t wait to see that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marisa</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/10/the-soft-drink-industry-strikes-back/comment-page-1/#comment-32646</link>
		<dc:creator>Marisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 19:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=1618#comment-32646</guid>
		<description>So taxing bad things like cigarettes is not big brother-ish, but taxing another bad thing like soda is? (Do sodas have anything good about them?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So taxing bad things like cigarettes is not big brother-ish, but taxing another bad thing like soda is? (Do sodas have anything good about them?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RawlinD</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/10/the-soft-drink-industry-strikes-back/comment-page-1/#comment-32645</link>
		<dc:creator>RawlinD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 19:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=1618#comment-32645</guid>
		<description>And CSPI are paragons of impartial advocacy?  Doing it all for our own good?  Never twist and cherry-pick science to their own ends?

Sure.

As I recall, CSPI were the same crusaders who championed for hydrogenated vegetable oils for frying.  Trans fats.

Oops.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And CSPI are paragons of impartial advocacy?  Doing it all for our own good?  Never twist and cherry-pick science to their own ends?</p>
<p>Sure.</p>
<p>As I recall, CSPI were the same crusaders who championed for hydrogenated vegetable oils for frying.  Trans fats.</p>
<p>Oops.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RawlinD</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/10/the-soft-drink-industry-strikes-back/comment-page-1/#comment-32644</link>
		<dc:creator>RawlinD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 19:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=1618#comment-32644</guid>
		<description>And CSPI are paragons of impartial advocacy?  Doing it all for our own good?  Never twist and cherry-pick science to their own ends?


Sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And CSPI are paragons of impartial advocacy?  Doing it all for our own good?  Never twist and cherry-pick science to their own ends?</p>
<p>Sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janet Camp</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/10/the-soft-drink-industry-strikes-back/comment-page-1/#comment-32642</link>
		<dc:creator>Janet Camp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 14:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=1618#comment-32642</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Jonathan. It&#039;s interesting to see to what lengths people will go to protect their investments. Soda companies are publicly traded and almost anyone with a 401k owns a piece of one of them. I do not, but people tend to find that odd and don&#039;t see a connection between their owning bits of these companies and the health of the nation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Jonathan. It&#8217;s interesting to see to what lengths people will go to protect their investments. Soda companies are publicly traded and almost anyone with a 401k owns a piece of one of them. I do not, but people tend to find that odd and don&#8217;t see a connection between their owning bits of these companies and the health of the nation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Brandon</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/10/the-soft-drink-industry-strikes-back/comment-page-1/#comment-32637</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 15:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=1618#comment-32637</guid>
		<description>I have spent the last hour perusing this organization&#039;s website, and it&#039;s truly horrifying.  Of course it is transparent in purpose, but nonetheless, this is the type of misinformation that keeps people from considering alternatives to their wasteful, unethical, and irreponsible lifestyles.  This is motivating!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have spent the last hour perusing this organization&#8217;s website, and it&#8217;s truly horrifying.  Of course it is transparent in purpose, but nonetheless, this is the type of misinformation that keeps people from considering alternatives to their wasteful, unethical, and irreponsible lifestyles.  This is motivating!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

