<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kellogg&#8217;s withdraws IMMUNITY claim!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/11/kelloggs-withdraws-immunity-claim/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/11/kelloggs-withdraws-immunity-claim/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 04:24:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: BPA in Canned Foods and Immunity Boosting Cereals--News in Review &#124; Home Ec</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/11/kelloggs-withdraws-immunity-claim/comment-page-1/#comment-33526</link>
		<dc:creator>BPA in Canned Foods and Immunity Boosting Cereals--News in Review &#124; Home Ec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 18:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=1702#comment-33526</guid>
		<description>[...] attorney requesting evidence that supports the claim. Marion Nestle has a nice discussion on her blog about the wiggle-room inherent in &#8217;structure-function&#8217; claims for food [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] attorney requesting evidence that supports the claim. Marion Nestle has a nice discussion on her blog about the wiggle-room inherent in &#8217;structure-function&#8217; claims for food [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel Assuncao</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/11/kelloggs-withdraws-immunity-claim/comment-page-1/#comment-33252</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel Assuncao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 01:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=1702#comment-33252</guid>
		<description>A friend bought a box with the Immunity claim in case it ever becomes a collector&#039;s edition.  She was astounded to see on the side of the box that Cocoa Krispies is now &#039;diabetes friendly&#039;!  Really, not only does it boost your immunity, but it&#039;s friendly to diabetics too?  Seems Kellogg&#039;s is getting desperate to keep the sales up on their sugary cereals.  According to http://www.kelloggsnutrition.com/diabetes, Kellogg&#039;s created their very own nutrition panel to create a set of criteria for their cereals to determine whether or not they are diabetes friendly and Cocoa Krispies met the criteria.  I wonder what&#039;s next?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A friend bought a box with the Immunity claim in case it ever becomes a collector&#8217;s edition.  She was astounded to see on the side of the box that Cocoa Krispies is now &#8216;diabetes friendly&#8217;!  Really, not only does it boost your immunity, but it&#8217;s friendly to diabetics too?  Seems Kellogg&#8217;s is getting desperate to keep the sales up on their sugary cereals.  According to <a href="http://www.kelloggsnutrition.com/diabetes" rel="nofollow">http://www.kelloggsnutrition.com/diabetes</a>, Kellogg&#8217;s created their very own nutrition panel to create a set of criteria for their cereals to determine whether or not they are diabetes friendly and Cocoa Krispies met the criteria.  I wonder what&#8217;s next?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris James</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/11/kelloggs-withdraws-immunity-claim/comment-page-1/#comment-33142</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=1702#comment-33142</guid>
		<description>This is as bad as the Cherry 7UP with Antioxidants.

http://www.7up.com/text/dietcherry7up.aspx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is as bad as the Cherry 7UP with Antioxidants.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.7up.com/text/dietcherry7up.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.7up.com/text/dietcherry7up.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gina Spadafori</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/11/kelloggs-withdraws-immunity-claim/comment-page-1/#comment-33053</link>
		<dc:creator>Gina Spadafori</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 17:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=1702#comment-33053</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m really glad about this one, since it had a real health risk to me: Every time I saw the packages, I thought I would DIE LAUGHING.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m really glad about this one, since it had a real health risk to me: Every time I saw the packages, I thought I would DIE LAUGHING.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hilary</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/11/kelloggs-withdraws-immunity-claim/comment-page-1/#comment-33051</link>
		<dc:creator>Hilary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 09:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=1702#comment-33051</guid>
		<description>Glad to see Kellogg&#039;s is removing the immunity claims from the packaging.  However, the company IS leaving up the claims to immunity on their website!  So, a gain, but not a complete win.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to see Kellogg&#8217;s is removing the immunity claims from the packaging.  However, the company IS leaving up the claims to immunity on their website!  So, a gain, but not a complete win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Want to see a real food war? This is the stoush to watch &#8211; Croakey</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/11/kelloggs-withdraws-immunity-claim/comment-page-1/#comment-33048</link>
		<dc:creator>Want to see a real food war? This is the stoush to watch &#8211; Croakey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 07:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=1702#comment-33048</guid>
		<description>[...] health nutritionist Professor Marion Nestle wasn&#8217;t impressed by the FDA&#8217;s lack of action on the immunity claim, and said the city [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] health nutritionist Professor Marion Nestle wasn&#8217;t impressed by the FDA&#8217;s lack of action on the immunity claim, and said the city [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rice Krispies Are Not Health Food, Much Less Magic &#171; Cocking A Snook!</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/11/kelloggs-withdraws-immunity-claim/comment-page-1/#comment-33043</link>
		<dc:creator>Rice Krispies Are Not Health Food, Much Less Magic &#171; Cocking A Snook!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 23:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=1702#comment-33043</guid>
		<description>[...] Now FDA says structure-function claims are OK to use as long as they are truthful and not misleading. Misleading, of course, is in the eye of the beholder. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Now FDA says structure-function claims are OK to use as long as they are truthful and not misleading. Misleading, of course, is in the eye of the beholder. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: À propos d&#8217;allégation sur l&#8217;immunité - Un article de Le Blog d’Albert Amgar</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/11/kelloggs-withdraws-immunity-claim/comment-page-1/#comment-33039</link>
		<dc:creator>À propos d&#8217;allégation sur l&#8217;immunité - Un article de Le Blog d’Albert Amgar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 21:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=1702#comment-33039</guid>
		<description>[...] lire aussi l&#8217;article de Marion Nestle sur ce sujet sur son blog, Food Politics, Kellogg&#8217;s withdraws IMMUNITY claim! ou Kellogg retire l&#8217;allégation sur [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] lire aussi l&#8217;article de Marion Nestle sur ce sujet sur son blog, Food Politics, Kellogg&#8217;s withdraws IMMUNITY claim! ou Kellogg retire l&#8217;allégation sur [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yum Yucky</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/11/kelloggs-withdraws-immunity-claim/comment-page-1/#comment-33032</link>
		<dc:creator>Yum Yucky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 15:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=1702#comment-33032</guid>
		<description>HA! I&#039;m am officially LOL&#039;ing at these junk food products. They&#039;re in desperation mode. So glad it backfired.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HA! I&#8217;m am officially LOL&#8217;ing at these junk food products. They&#8217;re in desperation mode. So glad it backfired.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emily</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/11/kelloggs-withdraws-immunity-claim/comment-page-1/#comment-33031</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 15:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=1702#comment-33031</guid>
		<description>My eyes about bugged out of my head when I saw those immunity boxes in the grocery store last week. Good riddance! These claims are getting absolutely ridiculous, but it&#039;s good to see *something* getting done about them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My eyes about bugged out of my head when I saw those immunity boxes in the grocery store last week. Good riddance! These claims are getting absolutely ridiculous, but it&#8217;s good to see *something* getting done about them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
