<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do traffic-light labels work?  Maybe not.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/12/do-traffic-light-labels-work-maybe-not/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/12/do-traffic-light-labels-work-maybe-not/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:20:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emily</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/12/do-traffic-light-labels-work-maybe-not/comment-page-1/#comment-34353</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 23:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=1854#comment-34353</guid>
		<description>So true!  Anything that comes in a box should probably also come with a warning label.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So true!  Anything that comes in a box should probably also come with a warning label.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EdSanDiego</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/12/do-traffic-light-labels-work-maybe-not/comment-page-1/#comment-34300</link>
		<dc:creator>EdSanDiego</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 12:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=1854#comment-34300</guid>
		<description>The First Amendment; The Right of Free Speech would be a barrier, unfortunately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The First Amendment; The Right of Free Speech would be a barrier, unfortunately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthro</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/12/do-traffic-light-labels-work-maybe-not/comment-page-1/#comment-34294</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 03:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=1854#comment-34294</guid>
		<description>@Lauren Slayton - That&#039;s a very good point and something I wondered about as well. Perhaps &quot;no claims&quot; for any packaged food--period. After all, no food, in isolation, is the end-all for nutrition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Lauren Slayton &#8211; That&#8217;s a very good point and something I wondered about as well. Perhaps &#8220;no claims&#8221; for any packaged food&#8211;period. After all, no food, in isolation, is the end-all for nutrition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lauren Slayton</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/12/do-traffic-light-labels-work-maybe-not/comment-page-1/#comment-34289</link>
		<dc:creator>Lauren Slayton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 20:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=1854#comment-34289</guid>
		<description>Great idea, I am all for a &quot;no claims&quot; approach. The caveat (and food companies love caveats) would be the criteria for defining a &quot;junk food.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great idea, I am all for a &#8220;no claims&#8221; approach. The caveat (and food companies love caveats) would be the criteria for defining a &#8220;junk food.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denis Stearns</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/12/do-traffic-light-labels-work-maybe-not/comment-page-1/#comment-34282</link>
		<dc:creator>Denis Stearns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=1854#comment-34282</guid>
		<description>Best. Idea. Ever.  Second suggestion: Among the more important ideas the government should be worrying about is cooking instructions, which no one checks.  (Remember the awful cooking instructions on the pot pies that caused so much injury?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Best. Idea. Ever.  Second suggestion: Among the more important ideas the government should be worrying about is cooking instructions, which no one checks.  (Remember the awful cooking instructions on the pot pies that caused so much injury?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthro</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/12/do-traffic-light-labels-work-maybe-not/comment-page-1/#comment-34280</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 15:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=1854#comment-34280</guid>
		<description>A very good thought. And so simple  

Sadly, I know some very well-to-do people who own shares in &quot;Big Food&quot; companies. These people vote and give large sums to political campaigns. Hmmmm...what&#039;s wrong with this picture?

I do not own any shares in any food production companies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A very good thought. And so simple  </p>
<p>Sadly, I know some very well-to-do people who own shares in &#8220;Big Food&#8221; companies. These people vote and give large sums to political campaigns. Hmmmm&#8230;what&#8217;s wrong with this picture?</p>
<p>I do not own any shares in any food production companies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark LaFountain</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/12/do-traffic-light-labels-work-maybe-not/comment-page-1/#comment-34279</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark LaFountain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 14:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=1854#comment-34279</guid>
		<description>Amen!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

