<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Serving size standards: maybe not so bad after all?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/12/serving-size-standards-maybe-not-so-bad-after-all/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/12/serving-size-standards-maybe-not-so-bad-after-all/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:07:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ET Addison</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/12/serving-size-standards-maybe-not-so-bad-after-all/comment-page-1/#comment-34352</link>
		<dc:creator>ET Addison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 23:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=1866#comment-34352</guid>
		<description>This is fascintating.  Food companies are trying to &#039;trick&#039; us all into eating more that we otherwise would.

Marion and other crusaders are trying to &#039;trick&#039; us into eating less than we otherwise would.

Silly game, if you asked me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is fascintating.  Food companies are trying to &#8216;trick&#8217; us all into eating more that we otherwise would.</p>
<p>Marion and other crusaders are trying to &#8216;trick&#8217; us into eating less than we otherwise would.</p>
<p>Silly game, if you asked me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Burkett</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/12/serving-size-standards-maybe-not-so-bad-after-all/comment-page-1/#comment-34351</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Burkett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 20:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=1866#comment-34351</guid>
		<description>Just a few days ago I was marveling at General Mills&#039; announcement about their plans to reduce sugar in kids&#039; cereals (which you noted had no particular date set) and was even more impressed by their stated serving size: three-quarters of a cup. Kellogg has been somewhat better with their stated serving sizes on a number of their cereals aimed at kids, listing them at one-and-a-quarter cups. Detailing larger serving sizes is a great step in the right direction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a few days ago I was marveling at General Mills&#8217; announcement about their plans to reduce sugar in kids&#8217; cereals (which you noted had no particular date set) and was even more impressed by their stated serving size: three-quarters of a cup. Kellogg has been somewhat better with their stated serving sizes on a number of their cereals aimed at kids, listing them at one-and-a-quarter cups. Detailing larger serving sizes is a great step in the right direction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dr. ann Kulze</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/12/serving-size-standards-maybe-not-so-bad-after-all/comment-page-1/#comment-34341</link>
		<dc:creator>dr. ann Kulze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 12:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=1866#comment-34341</guid>
		<description>Thank you for keeping us abreast of what is really going on. You are one of my heroes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for keeping us abreast of what is really going on. You are one of my heroes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

