<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The FDA&#8217;s BPA &#8220;concerns&#8221; get a response</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foodpolitics.com/2010/01/the-fdas-bpa-concerns-get-a-response/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2010/01/the-fdas-bpa-concerns-get-a-response/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:20:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: badthings</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2010/01/the-fdas-bpa-concerns-get-a-response/comment-page-1/#comment-34962</link>
		<dc:creator>badthings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=2033#comment-34962</guid>
		<description>The National Toxicology Program/Center For The Evaluation of Risks
To Human Reproduction report, which is what the FDA will use to evaluate the risks of BPA, is here: 

http://cerhr.niehs.nih.gov/chemicals/bisphenol/bisphenol-eval.html

The conclusion is basically that it&#039;s not a big deal, except possibly for infants. I&#039;m not competent to evaluate the toxicology, but it seems reasonable based on the (extensive) evidence discussed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The National Toxicology Program/Center For The Evaluation of Risks<br />
To Human Reproduction report, which is what the FDA will use to evaluate the risks of BPA, is here: </p>
<p><a href="http://cerhr.niehs.nih.gov/chemicals/bisphenol/bisphenol-eval.html" rel="nofollow">http://cerhr.niehs.nih.gov/chemicals/bisphenol/bisphenol-eval.html</a></p>
<p>The conclusion is basically that it&#8217;s not a big deal, except possibly for infants. I&#8217;m not competent to evaluate the toxicology, but it seems reasonable based on the (extensive) evidence discussed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TracyFood &#187; Yet another (very) belated Monkey Monday post</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2010/01/the-fdas-bpa-concerns-get-a-response/comment-page-1/#comment-34861</link>
		<dc:creator>TracyFood &#187; Yet another (very) belated Monkey Monday post</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=2033#comment-34861</guid>
		<description>[...] the FDA taking another look at bisphenol-A (BPA) in Saturday&#8217;s New York Times. Of course, she&#8217;s all over this story and the BPA issue in general. Personally, I&#8217;m just relieved to see coverage of this story [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the FDA taking another look at bisphenol-A (BPA) in Saturday&#8217;s New York Times. Of course, she&#8217;s all over this story and the BPA issue in general. Personally, I&#8217;m just relieved to see coverage of this story [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Myers</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2010/01/the-fdas-bpa-concerns-get-a-response/comment-page-1/#comment-34837</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Myers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 17:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=2033#comment-34837</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve posted an analysis of the significance of the FDA announcement here:  http://cli.gs/DYUSen

While given the scientific evidence now available on BPA, this is just a tiny step in the right direction for the FDA. But actually it&#039;s a huge leap for the FDA and it has implications far beyond BPA.

By the way... Anthro... it&#039;s Theo Colborn, not Theodora Krober, and she had two co-authors, Dianne Dumanoski and me. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve posted an analysis of the significance of the FDA announcement here:  <a href="http://cli.gs/DYUSen" rel="nofollow">http://cli.gs/DYUSen</a></p>
<p>While given the scientific evidence now available on BPA, this is just a tiny step in the right direction for the FDA. But actually it&#8217;s a huge leap for the FDA and it has implications far beyond BPA.</p>
<p>By the way&#8230; Anthro&#8230; it&#8217;s Theo Colborn, not Theodora Krober, and she had two co-authors, Dianne Dumanoski and me. <img src='http://www.foodpolitics.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthro</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2010/01/the-fdas-bpa-concerns-get-a-response/comment-page-1/#comment-34815</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 22:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=2033#comment-34815</guid>
		<description>I stopped using plastics years ago when I read Theodora Krober&#039;s book, &quot;Our Stolen Future&quot;. The evidence in that book was enough to convince me that it was better to be safe than sorry. The difficulty is that plastic food containers are becoming MORE popular--not less and it is getting very difficult to entirely avoid them. I have been to several stores and cannot find honey in a glass jar for less than $6 for a tiny jar. I have chickens and grow a garden, now I&#039;ll have to get a beehive as well! Luckily, the peanut butter I like still comes in a jar, because even the organic comes in a plastic container at the co-op.

I would like to add that I avoid all plastic now out of habit, not just because of BPA, but because of the waste of resources involved in its manufacture and the disposal issue (it never goes completely away).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I stopped using plastics years ago when I read Theodora Krober&#8217;s book, &#8220;Our Stolen Future&#8221;. The evidence in that book was enough to convince me that it was better to be safe than sorry. The difficulty is that plastic food containers are becoming MORE popular&#8211;not less and it is getting very difficult to entirely avoid them. I have been to several stores and cannot find honey in a glass jar for less than $6 for a tiny jar. I have chickens and grow a garden, now I&#8217;ll have to get a beehive as well! Luckily, the peanut butter I like still comes in a jar, because even the organic comes in a plastic container at the co-op.</p>
<p>I would like to add that I avoid all plastic now out of habit, not just because of BPA, but because of the waste of resources involved in its manufacture and the disposal issue (it never goes completely away).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emily</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2010/01/the-fdas-bpa-concerns-get-a-response/comment-page-1/#comment-34811</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 18:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=2033#comment-34811</guid>
		<description>What scares me is how long this issue took to become public knowledge.  I consider myself pretty educated on these matters, but it wasn&#039;t until about a year and a half ago that I was even aware of this potentially harmful stuff getting into my food!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What scares me is how long this issue took to become public knowledge.  I consider myself pretty educated on these matters, but it wasn&#8217;t until about a year and a half ago that I was even aware of this potentially harmful stuff getting into my food!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Food Politics » The FDA’s BPA “concerns” get a response -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2010/01/the-fdas-bpa-concerns-get-a-response/comment-page-1/#comment-34806</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Food Politics » The FDA’s BPA “concerns” get a response -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 16:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=2033#comment-34806</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Marion Nestle and nyusteinhardt, Christel Loll. Christel Loll said: The FDA’s BPA “concerns” get a response http://cli.gs/hXHvZ [RT @marionnestle] #foodjustice #BPA #FDA [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Marion Nestle and nyusteinhardt, Christel Loll. Christel Loll said: The FDA’s BPA “concerns” get a response <a href="http://cli.gs/hXHvZ" rel="nofollow">http://cli.gs/hXHvZ</a> [RT @marionnestle] #foodjustice #BPA #FDA [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

