Jul
5
2010
The latest on GM foods
USDA has just released the most recent statistics on use of genetically modified crops in the U.S.
This, of course, does not include sugar beets, which are also in the over 90% range.
How to interpret this? If you eat any processed foods containing corn, soybeans, or beet sugar, you should assume that they have a high probability of containing genetically modified ingredients.
You don’t like this? Choose organics!
You think GM foods should be labeled? Write your congressional representatives!
Leave a comment
Next public appearance
Feb
15
2012
New York: NGO Working Group on Food and Hunger, U.N.
Policy lunch talk in the series “the future of global food policy,” UN church Centre, 777 UN Plaza @44th St and 1st Ave, 1:00-2:45.
Search
Related posts
Topics for this post
All Topics
5-a-Day
AAFP(American Academy of Family Physicians)
AAP(American Academy of Pediatrics)
Acrylamide
ACSH(American Council on Science and Health)
Activity
ADA(American Dietetic Association)
Addiction
Additives
Advocacy
Agave
Aging
Agriculture
AHA(American Heart Association)
Alcohol
Alice-Waters
Allergies
American-Diabetes-Association
Animals
Antibiotics
Antioxidants
Arsenic
Artificial-sweeteners
ASN(American Society of Nutrition)
Asthma
Açaí
Beef
Bill-Marler
Biofuel
Blogs
Books
Bottled-water
BPA(Bisphenol-A)
Bread
Breakfast
Breast-feeding
Brian-Wansink
Bribery
Burger-King
Caffeine
CAFOs(Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations)
calcium
Calorie-labeling
Calories
Campbell
Canada
Cancer
Candy
Cantaloupe
Carcinogens
Cargill
CCF(Center for Consumer Freedom)
CDC(Centers for Disease Control)
CDC(Centers for Disease Control)
Cereals
Charlie-Rose
Checkoff
Cheerios
Cheese
Chickens
China
Chinese-infant-formula
Chocolate
Cholesterol
Climate change
Cloned-animals
Coca-Cola
Coffee
Colbert
Comments-Monitoring-Policy
Comments-Policy-Monitoring
ConAgra
Conflicts-of-interest
Consolidation
Consumer Reports
Cookie-dough
Cooking
Cooking-measurements
COOL(Country of Origin Labeling)
Corn
CSPI(Center for Science in the Public Interest)
CSR(Corporate Social Responsibility)
Dairy
Del Monte
Denmark
Diabetes
Diet-and-dieting
Diet-and-energy-drinks
Diet-drugs
Dietary-Guidelines
Disney
E.coli
Eat-less-and-move-more
EatingLiberally
EFSA
EFSA(European Food Safety Authority)
Eggs
EPA
Eric-Schlosser
Ethanol
Ethics
Events
Excerpt
FAO
FAQ
Farm-bill
Farm-policy
Farm-workers
farmers markets
farms
Fast food
Fats-and-oils
FDA
feed efficiency
Fiber
films
First Amendment
Fish
Flaxseed
FMI(Food Marketing Institute)
Food
Food-and-Water-Watch
Food-art
Food-assistance
Food-availability
Food-choice
Food-colors
Food-composition
Food-crisis
Food-culture
Food-deserts
Food-guide
Food-Inc
Food-industry
Food-industry-regulation
Food-magazines
Food-marketing
Food-miles
Food-movement
Food-policy
Food-quality
Food-safety
Food-security
Food-stamps
Food-studies
Food-supply
Food-systems
Food-trade
Food-waste
FOP(Front-of-Package)Labels
Fortification
Framingham-Heart-Study
Fruits-and-vegetables
FTC (Federal Trade Commission)
Functional-foods
Futures-markets
GAO
GAO(Government Accountability Office)
Gardens
Gary-Taubes
General-Mills
Gluten
GM(Genetically Modified)
GMA(Grocery Manufacturers Association)
Grassfed
Green-food
HACCP(Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point)
Hannaford
Health-aura
Health-claims
Health-statistics
Heart-disease
HFCS (High Fructose Corn Syrup)
HHS(Department of Health and Human Services)
Hormones
Hugo drinks
Hydroponics
hyperactivity
IASO
India
Infant-formula
International
Interviews
IOM (Institute of Medicine)
iraq
Irradiation
IWG(Interagency Working Group)
Jamie-Oliver
Japan
Job-Ads
Joy-of-Cooking
Juice-drinks
juices
Junk food
Kellogg
Kelly-Brownell
KFC
Kids' diets
King-Corn
Korea
Kraft
krill
Label-scoring-systems
Labels
Lawsuits
Legislation
Let's Move!
Listeria
Lobbies
Local-food
Lévi-Strauss
Mad-cow-disease
Malnutrition
Manure
maps
Margarines
Marketing to kids
Mark Hegsted
Mars
McDonald's
meal frequency
Meat
Meat safety
Meat substitutes
media
Melamine
Mercury
Michael-Pollan
Michael-Taylor
military
Milk
Monsanto
Movies
MSG
MyPlate
Nanotechnology
Natural
neighborhoods
Nestlé
New-York-City
New-Zealand
Niman
Nutrient-availability
Nutrition-education
Nutrition-standards
Nutritionism
Obama
Obesity
Obesity-in-kids
Obesity-policy
Omega-3-fats
Organic-fish
Organic-standards
Organics
orthorexia
Oysters
Pakistan
Partnerships
Patents
Paula Deen
Peanut-butter
Peanuts
PepsiCo
personal responsibility
Pesticides
Peter Jennings
Pet food
Phil Lempert
Photos
Pistachios
pizza
Pork
Portion sizes
Potatoes
pregnancy
Pric
Price-fixing
Price-of-food
Probiotics
Processing
Protein
Public-health
Pyramid
Quotes from What to Eat
Radioactivity
Raw-foods
Raw-milk
rBGH
recipes
Red-Bull
Research
Restaurants
Revolving-door
Right-to-food
Rosa DeLauro
RWJ Foundation
S.510
Salmonella
Salt
San-Francisco-Chronicle
scho
School-food
Seeds
shrek
Single-food-agency
Slow Food
Smart Choices
Snack foods
Socioeconomic-factors
Soft drinks
soy
Spinach
Splenda
Sprouts
Starvation
Stevia
sticky
Sugar
Supermarkets
Supplements
Supreme court
Surveys
sushi
Sweeteners
Swine flu
Taste
Taxes
Techno-foods
Television
Thomas Friedan
Tim Lang
Tobacco
Tomatoes
Toxins
Trans-fat
Tufts
Twitter
Tyson-foods
United Nations
Urban-farming
USDA
Vegetables
Vegetarian-and-vegan
Vending-machines
Videos
Vitamin-water
Vitamins
Wall-Street
Walmart
Water
WHO(World Health Organization)
Whole Foods
Whole grains
WIC
World hunger
Yearly Kos
Yogurt


Comments
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by nyusteinhardt, fadsandfancies.com. fadsandfancies.com said: Blogfeed: The latest on GM foods: USDA has just released the most recent statistics on use of genetically modifie… http://bit.ly/aQUxeu [...]
Marion:
Yes! We must all take pen in hand and voice our food concerns. Join me in calling July – the month that brought us Independence from tyranny – as the month for exercising our considerable freedom of speech to become free of food tyranny. Writing to elected officials is something that we all can do in the amount of time it takes to watch our favorite tv show.
Whether concerned about GMOs, package labeling, marketing to kids, or limiting salt in processed food products, voicing our concern is our precious right. It is also our responsibility to speak up about injustices perpetuated by special corporate interests running roughshod over the health and well-being of American family farmers and citizens.
Let our government know the importance of supporting a constitutional amendment to repeal the recent Supreme Court decision that grants corporations the same status as people. We cannot let some ‘people’ become more more equal than others.
[...] The best way to keep GM foods off of your plate is to stick with organic, whole foods. You might also take a look at True Food Now’s shopper’s guide for tips on avoiding genetically engineered foods. [h/t Food Politics] [...]
Write your congressman… a big fat campaign contribution check. Because you can be sure that the GMO industry is doing that right now. And since America system of government works on the principle of of Money Talks, you lovers of real, nonmodified food had better start coughing up cash and lots of it.
I just buy locally grown, GMO or organic. I don’t buy into the conspiracy nut attitude about GMO “safety” risks. But I do not begrudge those that are, to each their own.
@David: I used to feel the way you do, but it turns out that there’s a whole heap of reasons to oppose GMO’s that have nothing to do with safety. Monsanto’s bullying tactics in an effort to enforce a monopoly and protect their copyright are well-documented, and farmers are not allowed to save their own seed, essentially consigning them to eternal financial dependence on the seed companies. Add to that the fact that Roundup Ready crops are resulting in herbicide-resistant weeds taking over, and that Bt crops are breeding Bt-resistant pests, and you start to see that GMO’s are just a dead end that hurts even those that refuse to use grow them.
@David and Kristen,
Hmmm…agree with both of you. Thanks for the additional thoughts, Kristen; I am with you on the evils of Monsanto, but is this enough reason to distrust the science of GM (as opposed to the practice of it by corps such as Monsanto?)
———
I wish there was more to be done than writing the congressional representatives. You only get form letters consisteing of platitudes in response, so it seems a waste of time. The system is so corrupt at this point that only those who make huge contributions are heard. Without MASSIVE campaign finance reform, what’s the point?
Jeffrey Smith is probably the most knowledgeable voice on GM agriculture. If you want to know more about GMOs, check out his website:
http://www.responsibletechnology.org/GMFree/Home/index.cfm
[...] From MARION NESTLE Food Politics [...]
It’s true that money talks in the halls of Congress. Most people are against GMOs. If people speak up against their proliferation – and insist that those already here be labeled as such – there is a chance that the numbers will be significant enough to counter the dollars spent supporting them. After all, it was the citizenry that protested the green light initially given to GMOs when organic rules were being drafted, and they spoke through letter-writing and phone calls, not their wallets.
If this is important to you, call upon your friends, colleagues and relatives to join this most worthwhile fight. It costs nothing to send a few emails or make some phone calls. In fact, you can make several calls; every one is noted, even from the same people. Call or email both of your Senators, your member of Congress, and Sec’y Vilsack. We must fight the good fight. If all is lost we will sleep well knowing we took action. And in this case, it things aren’t reversed, it seems possible that all may well be lost.
Marion – pardon my sophomoric question: If I graft a couple of apple trees together, is that considered GM?
Thank you.
@Jeremiah: Not sophomoric at all. GM usually refers to changing the actual DNA of a plant, usually by insertion of genes from bacteria or another species of plant. Grafting doesn’t do that. The genetics of the root stock and graft remain as they were. I discuss all this in my book, “Safe Food,” just out in a new edition.
Jeffrey Smith is not the most knowledgeable person on genetic engineering. Two professors put together a website debunking the 65 claims he has made in his latest book:
http://academicsreview.org/reviewed-content/genetic-roulette/