<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Whatever happened to the FTC&#8217;s nutrition standards for food marketing?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foodpolitics.com/2010/07/whatever-happened-to-the-ftcs-nutrition-standards-for-food-marketing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2010/07/whatever-happened-to-the-ftcs-nutrition-standards-for-food-marketing/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:07:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don&#8217;t eat your broccoli: Junk food industry determined to target kids &#124; Grist</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2010/07/whatever-happened-to-the-ftcs-nutrition-standards-for-food-marketing/comment-page-1/#comment-98776</link>
		<dc:creator>Don&#8217;t eat your broccoli: Junk food industry determined to target kids &#124; Grist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 14:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=3525#comment-98776</guid>
		<description>[...] called &quot;weak.&quot; But even this step proved too much for industry. Then we waited for the next round. And waited. (During this time, I attended meetings with FTC&#039;s Mary Engle, who took pains to explain that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] called &quot;weak.&quot; But even this step proved too much for industry. Then we waited for the next round. And waited. (During this time, I attended meetings with FTC&#039;s Mary Engle, who took pains to explain that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FTC aún Mendigando Datos de Empresas Sobre sus Prácticas de Comercialización de Alimentos a los Niños &#171; AnaMariaQuispe&#039;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2010/07/whatever-happened-to-the-ftcs-nutrition-standards-for-food-marketing/comment-page-1/#comment-41054</link>
		<dc:creator>FTC aún Mendigando Datos de Empresas Sobre sus Prácticas de Comercialización de Alimentos a los Niños &#171; AnaMariaQuispe&#039;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2010 14:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=3525#comment-41054</guid>
		<description>[...] déjenme preguntar una vez más: ¿dónde está el largamente esperado informe de la FTC sobre las normas de nutrición en la [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] déjenme preguntar una vez más: ¿dónde está el largamente esperado informe de la FTC sobre las normas de nutrición en la [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marina</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2010/07/whatever-happened-to-the-ftcs-nutrition-standards-for-food-marketing/comment-page-1/#comment-39075</link>
		<dc:creator>Marina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 16:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=3525#comment-39075</guid>
		<description>Hi Marion, 

I am a communication professional working to help spread the word about a grass-roots campaign aimed at educating the public about an important mislabeling issue with Choice, Ocean Spray’s sweetened dried cranberry product.  Choice is marketed as a healthy food product even though it is mostly sugar—according to Ocean Spray’s own product literature, sugar contents can go as high as 80%.

On November 19, 2009, the National Consumer League filed a petition with the FDA requesting that the FDA investigate the misleading labeling with Choice – here’s the link http://www.nclnet.org/newsroom/press-releases/178-consumer-watchdog-to-fda-mislabeled-food-products-a-bad-choice-for-consumers  . This action went unnoticed by Ocean Spray, which continues to market the Choice product, now in select national retailers, as a wholesome cranberry product.  

With our educational campaign, www.scamberry.org, we are hoping to educate the public about this mislabeling issue and influence Ocean Spray to re-label their product. 

We thank you for your support in spreading the word:


You can find us:
Online at http://www.scamberry.org  
Twitter: www.twitter.com/scamberry
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Scamberry/132542676770549?v=photos#!/pages/Scamberry/132542676770549?ref=ts  

Yours,
Marina</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Marion, </p>
<p>I am a communication professional working to help spread the word about a grass-roots campaign aimed at educating the public about an important mislabeling issue with Choice, Ocean Spray’s sweetened dried cranberry product.  Choice is marketed as a healthy food product even though it is mostly sugar—according to Ocean Spray’s own product literature, sugar contents can go as high as 80%.</p>
<p>On November 19, 2009, the National Consumer League filed a petition with the FDA requesting that the FDA investigate the misleading labeling with Choice – here’s the link <a href="http://www.nclnet.org/newsroom/press-releases/178-consumer-watchdog-to-fda-mislabeled-food-products-a-bad-choice-for-consumers" rel="nofollow">http://www.nclnet.org/newsroom/press-releases/178-consumer-watchdog-to-fda-mislabeled-food-products-a-bad-choice-for-consumers</a>  . This action went unnoticed by Ocean Spray, which continues to market the Choice product, now in select national retailers, as a wholesome cranberry product.  </p>
<p>With our educational campaign, <a href="http://www.scamberry.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.scamberry.org</a>, we are hoping to educate the public about this mislabeling issue and influence Ocean Spray to re-label their product. </p>
<p>We thank you for your support in spreading the word:</p>
<p>You can find us:<br />
Online at <a href="http://www.scamberry.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.scamberry.org</a><br />
Twitter: <a href="http://www.twitter.com/scamberry" rel="nofollow">http://www.twitter.com/scamberry</a><br />
Facebook: <a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Scamberry/132542676770549?v=photos#!/pages/Scamberry/132542676770549?ref=ts" rel="nofollow">http://www.facebook.com/pages/Scamberry/132542676770549?v=photos#!/pages/Scamberry/132542676770549?ref=ts</a>  </p>
<p>Yours,<br />
Marina</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Where are the FTC nutrition standards for food marketing? &#171; Later On</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2010/07/whatever-happened-to-the-ftcs-nutrition-standards-for-food-marketing/comment-page-1/#comment-39059</link>
		<dc:creator>Where are the FTC nutrition standards for food marketing? &#171; Later On</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 16:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=3525#comment-39059</guid>
		<description>[...] in Business, Daily life, Food, Government, Law, Obama administration at 9:18 am by LeisureGuy Marion Nestle: I keep hearing rumors that food industry opposition is what is holding up release of the FTC’s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in Business, Daily life, Food, Government, Law, Obama administration at 9:18 am by LeisureGuy Marion Nestle: I keep hearing rumors that food industry opposition is what is holding up release of the FTC’s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lori Dorfman</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2010/07/whatever-happened-to-the-ftcs-nutrition-standards-for-food-marketing/comment-page-1/#comment-39047</link>
		<dc:creator>Lori Dorfman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 20:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=3525#comment-39047</guid>
		<description>Marion, thanks for posting this. In April, the Food Marketing Workgroup asked the FTC publish the draft standards in the Federal Register so that advocates, researchers, industry, and other interested 
parties can comment on them. We need strong, science-based marketing standards for food marketed to kids -- and a robust *public* conversation about them, which we can&#039;t have until the draft is published.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marion, thanks for posting this. In April, the Food Marketing Workgroup asked the FTC publish the draft standards in the Federal Register so that advocates, researchers, industry, and other interested<br />
parties can comment on them. We need strong, science-based marketing standards for food marketed to kids &#8212; and a robust *public* conversation about them, which we can&#8217;t have until the draft is published.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Food Politics » Whatever happened to the FTC’s nutrition standards for food marketing? -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.foodpolitics.com/2010/07/whatever-happened-to-the-ftcs-nutrition-standards-for-food-marketing/comment-page-1/#comment-39037</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Food Politics » Whatever happened to the FTC’s nutrition standards for food marketing? -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 13:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=3525#comment-39037</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by nyusteinhardt. nyusteinhardt said: Whatever happened to the FTC’s nutrition standards for food marketing? http://ff.im/-nCcSx [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by nyusteinhardt. nyusteinhardt said: Whatever happened to the FTC’s nutrition standards for food marketing? <a href="http://ff.im/-nCcSx" rel="nofollow">http://ff.im/-nCcSx</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

