Information about the Aspen Ideas Festival is here. I am scheduled for a session, The American Wellness Paradox, currently scheduled from 11:00-11:50 a.m., at the East Lawn Tent. This will be a discussion with senior HHS policy advisor, Calley Means. Here’s the blurb on it: “Americans are spending more than ever on healthcare, supplements, wellness trends, and “clean eating,” yet rates of chronic disease and metabolic illness continue to climb. As skepticism fuels the rise of movements like MAHA, debates over what Americans should eat have become deeply cultural, political, and economic. Two influential voices with sharply different perspectives on nutrition and food science explore how food systems, farming practices, consumer culture, and the wellness industry collided to create one of the defining public health debates of our time.”
Keeping up with the cereal news
Sugary breakfast cereals are a hard cell these days, and marketers are getting increasingly creative.
Item: The Cornucopia Institute’s investigative report on “Natural” cereals warns consumers that “natural”—a term with no regulatory meaning—is marketing hype. “Natural” is not the same as Organic. “Natural” cereals have all kinds of things not allowed in Organic cereals. It’s best not to confuse them.
Item: Researchers at the Yale Rudd Center for Food Policy & Obesity report in Public Health Nutrition that the households in their study tended to buy cereals advertised directly to children 13 times more frequently than non-advertised products, and that African-American and Hispanic families were most likely to buy cereals advertised directly to children.
Item: The Public Health Advocacy Institute (PHAI) reports that General Mills is using claims about whole grains to distract consumers from the sugar content.
The company’s claim of “More Whole Grain Than Any Other Ingredient*” comes with an asterisk. This goes to the disclaimer “*as compared to any other single ingredient.”
PHAI suggests taking a look at the General Mills’ web page about sugar. This says that “Ready-to-eat cereals account for a relatively small amount of a child’s daily sugar intake.”
General Mills compares plain Cheerios (1 gram of sugar per serving) to Trix (10 grams of sugar per serving ), and asks:
From a calorie and nutrient standpoint, are both products a good breakfast choice?
The answer: “Yes, they are. In fact, all General Mills cereals are lower calorie, nutrient dense choices.
From a calorie and nutrient standpoint, are both products a good breakfast choice?
Yes, they are. In fact, all General Mills cereals are lower calorie, nutrient dense choices.
From the standpoint of nutritionism (judging a product by its nutrient content), Cheerios is a better-for-you choice.
But both are highly processed cereals, thereby raising that same old philosophical question: is a somewhat better-for-you processed food necessarily a good choice?
A good question to ponder as you wander down the cereal aisle.
