Food Politics

by Marion Nestle
Jun 15 2026

Guest post: A visit to my Manhattan terrace

Once again, I am breaking my rule about no guest posts, but this one is too much fun not to share.  Erin Winger interviewed me for her Substack, which she calls Going to Seed, and agreed to let me do a repost.  I thought this would be a great way to start the week.  Enjoy!

Going to Seed

Jun 12 2026

Weekend reading: Flagstaff anti-hunger efforts

In September 2025, I was invited by the Flagstaff Family Food Center to give a talk on “Anti-Hunger Politics 2025: Planting Seeds for Resilience.”  This is an organization in Northern Arizona doing outstanding anti-hunger work.

The Center has just produced its 2025 Northern Arizona Food Equity Report.  The online copy is here.  It is well worth a look.

The Center sent this to me with this message:

We hope this resource can serve as a resource for multiple stakeholders across the food landscape, like you. Data and lived experience should always be the guiding light in this work, and we are proud to be part of a community that shares that sentiment and helps carry it out.

I wrote the Foreword to the report (see page 4).  Here’s what I said—and I meant every word:

It is my honor and privilege to introduce the impressive and utterly compelling
2025 Northern Arizona Food Equity Report. The Flagstaff Family Food
Center (FFFC) has done a superb job of collecting what must have been
incredibly hard-to-get data on hunger and food insecurity in the rural and
tribal communities it serves.

These data reveal a shocking truth: many people—even those working full- or
part-time—lack sufficient resources to feed themselves and their families
and require government and private food assistance to survive. Even working
people cannot keep up with the rising costs of housing, rent, utilities, and food.

Today, government food assistance programs like SNAP and WIC are under
siege and targeted for cuts, not increases. Private groups like FFFC do the
best they can to fill the gaps and meet the ever-increasing demands for
food assistance, especially from the most vulnerable members of society-
-children, the disabled, and seniors.

This report presents the stark facts: too many Northern Arizona residents
experience food insecurity, and their numbers are rising. It explains the
reasons for food insecurity, particularly for these communities, and draws on
the lived experience of community members to describe why this problem
requires an immediate solution. It describes potential policy solutions, and
the reality-based barriers to achieving them. And it presents this critically
important information without ever losing sight of the cultural context in
which food insecurity occurs in Northern Arizona.

These are tough times in America. Northern Arizona is fortunate to have a
group like the FFFC doing the hard work and clear thinking needed to solve
some of the most difficult problems facing our society today.

Jun 11 2026

Do salmon really get high on cocaine? And will you if you eat it?

I was riveted to come across this item.

Coked-Up Salmon Go Speeding UpstreamHave you ever wondered whether the cocaine you snort ends up giving Atlantic salmon the zoomies? It turns out it does—at least to a certain extent. Welcome to the Salmonopolis 500.

No.  It never entered my mind.

But now there is a study:  Cocaine pollution alters the movement and space use of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) in a large natural lake [Current Biology, 36, 2018-2027.e4]

Here, we combine slow-release chemical implants with acoustic telemetry tracking to reveal how environmentally realistic levels of cocaine and its main metabolite, benzoylecgonine, affect the movement of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) smolts in a large natural lake (Lake Vättern, Sweden). Benzoylecgonine exposure increased weekly movement rates of fish in the wild, with exposed fish swimming up to ∼1.9 times farther per week relative to controls. In addition, benzoylecgonine-exposed fish dispersed up to ∼12.3 km farther than control conspecifics.

Oh.  They put the cocaine into the fish.  Not a natural experiment.

But here’s another study, examining drugs in the natural environment: Pharmaceutical pollution of the world’s rivers  [PNAS:119 (8) e2113947119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2113947119]

Here, we present the findings of a global reconnaissance of pharmaceutical pollution in rivers. The study monitored 1,052 sampling sites along 258 rivers in 104 countries of all continents, thus representing the pharmaceutical fingerprint of 471.4 million people. We show that the presence of these contaminants in surface water poses a threat to environmental and/or human health in more than a quarter of the studied locations globally.

Cocaine did not show up as a major contaminant in this study.  Tylenol does; it is #1.

The contaminants with the highest concentrations were paracetamol, caffeine, metformin, fexofenadine, sulfamethoxazole (antimicrobial), metronidazole (antimicrobial), and gabapentin

Comment

We take a lot of Tylenol and drink a lot of coffee, explaining the two drugs most frequently found in this study.  Lots of people take metformin for type 2 diabetes.  The more drugs we take, the more we pee out, and the more gets into rivers.

The investigators found huge socioeconomic inequities in drug contamination.  There were drugs everywhere they sampled, even in Antarctica, but the highest levels were in low- and middle-income countries with unregulated pharmaceutical manufacturing plants, untreated sewage, and waste dumping.

Rivers with the lowest drug contamination were in remote areas with few people or those with access to modern medicine, were in places with effective wastewater treatment, or had so much flow that the drugs got diluted.

I’m not worried about cocaine in salmon.  And I live in New York City which has outstanding water treatment.

Otherwise?  Get a good filter.

Tags:
Jun 10 2026

A MAHA Win? Trix without petroleum dyes

My forthcoming (September 8) book with Lisa Sutherland, Sugar Coated: Unboxing the Hidden Forces Shaping America’s Favorite Breakfast Food, discusses Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) efforts to remove potentially harmful artificial colors from the food supply.

I just bought the first cereal that dropped those colors and replaced them with vegetable dyes.

The company did this quietly.  I had to look hard to find the green label in the upper right corner saying “colors from natural sources.”  Compare the colors of the cereal (pretty close to what it actually looks like) to the original Trix colors, still on the market.

As for the cereals, both:

  • Are ultra-processed
  • Have artificial flavors and other chemical additives
  • Contain 12 grams of sugars per serving
  • Contain only 1 gram of fiber

Trix without artificial colors

Whole Grain Corn, Sugar, Corn Meal, Corn Syrup, Maltodextrin, Rice Flour, Canola And/Or Sunflower Oil, Salt, Color (Vegetable And Fruit Juice, Annatto Extract, Turmeric Extract And Other Color Added), Natural And Artificial Flavor, Trisodium Phosphate, Citric Acid, Malic Acid, Rosemary Extract. Vitamins And Minerals

Trix original, with artificial colors

Whole Grain Corn, Sugar, Rice Flour, Corn Syrup, Canola and/or Sunflower Oil, Salt, Trisodium Phosphate, Natural and Artificial Flavor, Red 40, Yellow 6, Blue 1 and Other Color Added, Citric Acid, Malic Acid, Rosemary Extract. Vitamins and Minerals

Comment

Removing the artificial dyes is a good idea, but does not convert Trix to a health food.  Alas.

Jun 9 2026

Food safety in peril: a post from Bill Marler

I don’t usually host guest posts here, but I read food safety lawyer Bill Marler’s blog and obtained his permission to reprint it.  It should be obvious why I thought you should read it.

The people who find foodborne outbreaks are being fired, defunded, and disbanded — and the bugs do not care.

For more than thirty years I have represented the families on the other end of a foodborne outbreak — the parents of children on dialysis with hemolytic uremic syndrome, the survivors of a contaminated hamburger or a bag of spinach, the people left planning funerals. I built a career holding companies accountable when the food safety system failed. I never imagined the federal government itself would become one of the things that fails. Over the past year and a half, it has.

The cuts this administration has made to the FDA, the CDC, and the USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service are not abstract budget lines. They are going to get people sick, and some of them are going to die. The cruelest part is that it is all being done under a banner that reads “Make America Healthy Again.”

Consider the FDA, which polices roughly 80 percent of our food. It lost nearly 3,900 employees in 2025 alone, part of an HHS purge of some 20,000 jobs. It began in February with what the agency’s own deputy commissioner for human foods called the “indiscriminate” firing of 89 people from the food program — after which he resigned, saying it was “fruitless” to continue. The administration fired so blindly that it had to scramble to rehire the official in charge of infant formula safety.

By March, HHS planned to cut a fifth of the FDA’s workforce, including more than 170 people from inspections and investigations. Understand what that means. In 2024 the FDA had all of 443 inspectors to cover more than 36,000 food facilities at home and abroad — against the roughly 1,500 it says it actually needs. We were already running on fumes. ProPublica found that foreign food inspections fell by nearly half in early 2025. We are importing more food than ever and looking at less of it.

Then there is the surveillance — the quiet, unglamorous detective work that is the entire ballgame in my world. By the time a family calls me, public health investigators have usually already connected a sick child in Ohio to a sick adult in Oregon and traced both to a single contaminated lot. On July 1, the CDC gutted that capacity, scaling its FoodNet surveillance network back from eight pathogens to two. It stopped actively tracking Campylobacter, Listeria, and four others. Listeria — the same pathogen that, in the Boar’s Head outbreak just last year, caused the deadliest listeriosis outbreak in over a decade. We are turning off the smoke detectors and telling ourselves the house won’t burn.

The USDA has done its part. Its inspection service shed hundreds of positions while line speeds at some slaughterhouses climb and inspectors step back — fewer people asked to catch more contamination moving faster. And in a move that should alarm anyone who believes in evidence, the department disbanded the two scientific advisory committees that had guided federal food safety policy for decades, one of them since 1971. Their combined cost was about $300,000 a year. One was, at the moment it was dissolved, reviewing how to keep Listeria out of deli meat. That work simply stopped. For good measure, FSIS withdrew its proposed rule to limit Salmonella in raw poultry — a pathogen that sickens more than a million Americans a year — after years of work.

I want to be fair. No one in Washington woke up wanting to poison a child, and the food safety system was underfunded long before this administration; I have said so under presidents of both parties. But you cannot fire the inspectors, blind the surveillance, suspend the lab testing, dismiss the scientists, and abandon the rule making all at once and still claim that food safety is a priority. Actions are what count, and these all point one direction.

Here is what three decades have taught me. Outbreaks do not announce themselves. They are found by people — inspectors who walk the plants, epidemiologists who connect the dots, technicians who confirm the strain. Take those people away and the outbreaks still come. We just find them later, after more children are on dialysis and more families are planning funerals instead of birthday parties. The bacteria do not care about budget cuts. They never have.

I have spent my life suing companies that put profit ahead of safety. If these cuts stand, I expect to be busier than ever. That is the worst thing I could possibly tell you.

Jun 8 2026

The wonders of AI: a cubist portrait

Last week on my way home from the Washington, DC, launch of the ultra-processed papers from the American Journal of Public Health, I was corresponding with Richard McCarthy (Think Like Pirates) about our mutual sadness about the death of Slow Food founder, Carlo Petrini.

Richard said our conversation inspired him to ask the free ChatGBT to produce this portrait.

I absolutely love it and wish I looked like that.

I’m trying to figure out how to use it.  Suggestions welcome.

Thanks Richard (and AI)!

Jun 5 2026

Weekend reading: IPES-Food’s report on the New Geopolitics of Food

The International Panel of Experts on Sustainable Food Systems has released its latest report, The New Geopolitics of Food: Navigating policies for resilient self-reliance.

The report focuses on how “how wars, trade disputes, aid cuts, climate shocks, and weakening international cooperation are pushing up food prices, deepening hunger, and reshaping global food security.”

It draws on the experience of governments of many countries in attempting to stabilize prices, support farmers, and protect access to food.

The report argues: “governments must shift towards resilient self-reliance: strengthening domestic and regional food systems, reducing dependence on volatile global markets, and ensuring farmers and communities can weather future shocks.

As steps toward food self-reliance, it calls on governments to use the tools they have to stabilize and improve their food supply chains. 

Good idea.

Resources

Jun 4 2026

The eye-rolling protein craze: some thoughts

Nutritionists like me cannot understand why people think they need more protein, so much so that the food industry is putting protein into everything.

Most Americans consume close to twice the amount of protein needed, and practically anyone who consumes enough calories gets plenty.  Protein is in lots of foods and it’s really hard not to get enough unless you aren’t eating much.

I’m endlessly entertained by protein in everything, and am tracking its effect on the food industry.

Guess what.  There’s a shortage.

Protein powder shortage threatens America’s biggest food craze: Companies are now grappling with whether to raise prices at a time when consumers are already reeling from a prolonged period of inflation.

The food industry views the protein craze as a growth opportunity.

How protein is shaping active nutrition in 2026:  Sustained demand for protein continues to define the active and performance nutrition space. But where are the growth niches?… Read more

And it’s not just food.  Look what’s happening with drinks.

From coffee to soda: How protein is making waves in beverage innovation:  Drinks are a new frontier for protein innovation… Read more

And just because a product contains protein, doesn’t necessarily mean its healthy.

The new paradox: Protein vs processing:  Protein is the snack industry’s hottest claim but if the foods delivering it are still ultra-processed, the sector may be building its next health halo on shaky ground… Read more

Unusual sources of protein are not doing so well these days.

Insect protein’s reality check: High costs, failed ventures and slower-than-expected market growth temper early optimism.

But peptides—smaller chains of amino acids—are another craze, despite lack of evidence for their benefits.

Peptides Move From Fringe Biohacks to Functional Food Frontier:  As demand surges for targeted health solutions, Nuritas’ Nora Khaldi discusses how AI is transforming peptide discovery, and why food and beverage may be the industry’s next big play… Listen now

As always, I’m for getting protein from foods, largely plant sources.  Yes plant proteins sometimes are low in essential amino acids but the low ones differ among plant sources, so variety takes care of gaps: rice, wheat, and corn with beans, peanut butter sandwiches.  Easy.