Redirected or reduced spending by SNAP households could lead to sales losses of $430 million for soda, $300 million for candy, and $100 million for energy drinks across the 19 states that will have waivers in place by the end of the year, according to the firm’s research.
Food retailers are the beneficiaries of SNAP EBT cards. SNAP recipients buy a lot of soda (as do lots of other people). In waiver states, they will have to use their own money to buy soda.
Will waivers reduce overall sales? Retailers think so.
Will waivers reduce consumption of sugary drinks, and improve the health of SNAP recipients?
Let’s hope these states are sponsoring research to find out.
StatNews ‘ Isabella Cueto and J. Emory Parker did a detailed analysis of 80 promises made by the MAHA administration and evaluated progress toward meeting them.
I’ve pulled out the promises most relevant to food and nutrition (I’m surprised at how many there are). These are worth reading, not least because of Stat’s thoughtful analysis of what the actions or inactions mean.
Lots of others bear on food and nutrition, but less directly.
Once again, I am breaking my rule about no guest posts, but this one is too much fun not to share. Erin Weinger interviewed me for her Substack, which she calls Going to Seed, and agreed to let me do a repost. I thought this would be a great way to start the week. Enjoy!
🥗 A Visit to Nutritionist Marion Nestle’s NYC Terrace
What the food policy expert is growing in Greenwich Village.
Green Thumb: Dr. Marion Nestle in her New York terrace garden on June 11, 2026 (all photos courtesy of the subject).
Welcome to this installment of Field Trip, our series that goes inside gardens and farms across the globe and spotlights the interesting people who keep them alive. Today we’re talking to nutritionist and food policy expert Marion Nestle about her gorgeous Greenwich Village terrace garden.
When I emailed Marion Nestle, I didn’t think she’d respond. After all, the 89 year-old nutritionist is arguably the nation’s foremost expert on food policy, has a new book coming out in September (her 17th) and is readying to appear at the Aspen Ideas Festival on June 30, where she’ll speak on a “wellness” panel with Casey Means, RFK’s withdrawn pick for surgeon general (it’s fair to say that Nestle and Means have more than a few differing views). She’s been on advisory boards and committees for the FDA, USDA and American Cancer Society, to name a few. She’s a public health advocate and an outspoken critic against the corporate lobbying, regulatory loopholes and deceptive marketing practices that cause Americans — especially ones with fewer financial resources — to get and stay stuck in a cycle of poor health. She also updates her own website, Food Politics, with articles and links to new research almost daily.
I first heard of Dr. Nestle back in 2004 when she appeared in Super Size Me, the documentary that followed filmmaker Morgan Spurlock as he exclusively ate McDonalds for 30 days. She was warm and funny and talked about nutrition and the fast food marketing machine in a clear, no bullshit way that let viewers know just how truly knowledgeable she was in her area of expertise. It resonated.
Around this time I was a chubby college kid eating late night cheesy bread slathered in packets of ranch and butter sauce (sometimes as both a late night, post-imbibement snack and again in the morning for breakfast, when it obviously tastes even better). So when I eventually started to prioritize actually feeling good in my body, Dr. Nestle’s philosophy on eating a wide variety of largely plant-based whole unprocessed foods felt incredibly simple and quite rational. Back then, eating “clean” — i.e. organic fruits and vegetables, lean protein, food containing ingredients you could recognize and pronounce — wasn’t a fad (fad diets, unsurprisingly, are not something Dr. Nestle has much patience for). Today, I have a copy of What to Eat Now, Dr. Nestle’s landmark 2006 book that was updated and re-released last fall, sitting on my bedside table.
So again, I didn’t think I’d hear back when I reached out to ask if Dr. Nestle would tell me more about the terrace garden she keeps in New York, which she’d mentioned in passing in a Washington Postarticle I read last year promoting her book. I’ve been thinking about her and her terrace ever since.
But she did respond. And she did so with the exact same gusto and warmth she seems to convey in her writing and her media appearances. “I would be delighted,” she wrote, before letting me know that work was soon starting on her Manhattan apartment building and that the garden photo shoot would have to happen right away. Pictures of Dr. Nestle radiating joy amid her terrace greenery followed almost immediately.
Below, Dr. Nestle dives into her gardening philosophy (“effortless”), how she’s created a productive plot of land in the middle of New York City, and the biggest thing she’s splurged on for her lush outdoor space.
Your terrace is gorgeous — an oasis in the city! What part of Manhattan are you growing your garden in?
Marion Nestle: Greenwich Village on the edge of NoHo on the 12th floor of a landmarked building built in 1931. The apartment was formerly occupied by Congressman and Mayor Ed Koch. I moved in when he lost the election and moved to a tonier building.
Tell me a little about what’s out there. I see herbs, Sweet Williams, and a Japanese Maple among so many other plants. What are some of the other plants and flowers you have at the moment?
M.N. When I first moved in, I had a view up to 53rd street, but now I have a bunch of evergreens to block my current view of the building that blocked it. I try to grow as much food as possible, and have dwarf sour cherry and peach trees, blueberries, raspberries, strawberries, Cayuga White grapes, lettuce, tomatoes, basil, rosemary, cilantro, parsley, and oregano. I’ve got daylilies, dianthus, and azaleas. I love loosestrife and put some in and now I know why everyone is afraid of it; it has seeded practically every pot and is a big weeding chore. And then the vines: ivy growing up the walls for my neighbors to enjoy, and two kinds of honeysuckle. Several of the trees are volunteers—the hawthorn, for example, and the tall weedy ones. The ivy also makes prolific seeds that sprout everywhere.
I’d love to know a bit of the history and evolution of the garden. Did you have any help with the planning or did you do it yourself?
M.N. As should be obvious, I like messy, overgrown gardens. When I first moved in, the super said no plants on the terrace. At the time, it was covered with beautiful Mexican tiles. I wrote a lengthy petition and promised to keep all pots off the tiles, and that’s how it started. It’s evolved over the years, especially after the times the building has to be pointed; the city requires checking for loose bricks every 5-10 years. When that happens, everything goes off the terrace and the equipment goes on it, usually for months. When they are done, I start over.
Is this your first garden?
M.N. I’ve always had gardens whenever I could. This dates back to a summer camp in Vermont that had a fabulous kitchen garden along with wild berries everywhere.
What is upkeep like? How much time and maintenance does it require? I’d also love to know a little about your gardening routine — do you listen to music or podcasts when you garden?
M.N. None of the above. It’s effortless except for getting it going in the spring when I clean out the hanging boxes of mixed annuals and perennials. After that, everything is on its own. I just weed, pinch, and harvest. Everything is in pots. They stay out in the winter and either survive or not. Nothing comes in. They are on their own. There used to be two terrific plant stores within easy walking distance but both have closed so whatever plants I buy come from the Union Square farmers market or from online stores.
I travel a lot and what makes this all possible is a fabulous computerized watering system managed by a really competent company. They turn the system on in the spring and off in the winter and check it all several times in the summer. I can leave anytime and not worry about it.
What got me most excited to talk to you — given your line of work, expertise, and areas of advocacy — are the edible portions of your garden. How do you use the edible things you grow, and how do those things contribute to you being able to eat the way you want? Personally, I started my first herb garden because I wanted to have chives, cilantro and basil on hand for my favorite white bean dish that I cook and I didn’t want to have to buy herbs in plastic clamshells. I’m curious if there’s any one meal, dish, etc. that inspired you to start growing your own food.
M.N. Let’s be real. My cherry tree produced three tiny jars of jam. I do go out and pick the berries for breakfast during the weeks they are in fruit, and I pick the lettuce for salads, but we are talking about food for one here.
I just read the guest post on your website about our current food safety crisis due to government cuts (I have been nervous more than once in the last year and a half to eat “triple washed” bagged organic spinach et al). What can we do at home, if anything, to help reduce our risk a bit? How can our gardens play a part in that solve?
M.N. Wash your veggies! Garden vegetables are much less likely to be contaminated with pathogens than industrially produced chopped salad mixes.
I’m not sure how intense the pests are in New York City. But can you suggest any natural pest-control methods that a home gardener should use to ensure they’re not spraying or using pesticides on their crops?
M.N. As I said, my plants are on their own. I had a bad problem with lily bugs this year and didn’t get any regular lilies. The daylilies were OK. Sometimes I will bring in a tomato plant that comes with hornworms. They have to be picked off by hand. Another advantage of a 12th floor garden: I don’t have to worry about deer or rabbits.
From a nutrition perspective, are there any specific fruits and vegetables that you wish more people had on hand in their gardens? What are some powerhouses that we should all try to grow and grab to impact our day-to-day eating habits in a positive way?
M.N. I’m an omnivore. All fruits and vegetables have nutritional benefits. I vote for growing the ones you like best.
I think people who have never before grown their own food are scared to do it if they don’t have “space.” But you’re proving that you don’t need a huge yard or farm to get started. What advice would you have for someone who may have a terrace or balcony? Where should they start?
M.N. Salads are easy. Put in a few lettuce plants. Radishes! I can only grow cherry tomatoes on my terrace; the big ones don’t work. Plants need soil, light, and water. Experiment!
What gardening wisdom do you wish you knew when you were just beginning?
M.N. I don’t consider myself a particularly wise gardener. I mostly let the plants do their thing and try to keep the weeds to a minimum. If I get the light right, they will grow. I like to start with small plants and see how they do. That tall elm tree was given to me as a small shoot; the azaleas were from supermarkets; I brought the white pine in a 4 inch pot from New Hampshire. I don’t spend much money on it, except for the watering system—my one gardening luxury.
Share this post with someone who loves plants. You know you want to. 🌱
In September 2025, I was invited by the Flagstaff Family Food Center to give a talk on “Anti-Hunger Politics 2025: Planting Seeds for Resilience.” This is an organization in Northern Arizona doing outstanding anti-hunger work.
We hope this resource can serve as a resource for multiple stakeholders across the food landscape, like you. Data and lived experience should always be the guiding light in this work, and we are proud to be part of a community that shares that sentiment and helps carry it out.
I wrote the Foreword to the report (see page 4). Here’s what I said—and I meant every word:
It is my honor and privilege to introduce the impressive and utterly compelling
2025 Northern Arizona Food Equity Report. The Flagstaff Family Food
Center (FFFC) has done a superb job of collecting what must have been
incredibly hard-to-get data on hunger and food insecurity in the rural and
tribal communities it serves.
These data reveal a shocking truth: many people—even those working full- or
part-time—lack sufficient resources to feed themselves and their families
and require government and private food assistance to survive. Even working
people cannot keep up with the rising costs of housing, rent, utilities, and food.
Today, government food assistance programs like SNAP and WIC are under
siege and targeted for cuts, not increases. Private groups like FFFC do the
best they can to fill the gaps and meet the ever-increasing demands for
food assistance, especially from the most vulnerable members of society-
-children, the disabled, and seniors.
This report presents the stark facts: too many Northern Arizona residents
experience food insecurity, and their numbers are rising. It explains the
reasons for food insecurity, particularly for these communities, and draws on
the lived experience of community members to describe why this problem
requires an immediate solution. It describes potential policy solutions, and
the reality-based barriers to achieving them. And it presents this critically
important information without ever losing sight of the cultural context in
which food insecurity occurs in Northern Arizona.
These are tough times in America. Northern Arizona is fortunate to have a
group like the FFFC doing the hard work and clear thinking needed to solve
some of the most difficult problems facing our society today.
Coked-Up Salmon Go Speeding Upstream: Have you ever wondered whether the cocaine you snort ends up giving Atlantic salmon the zoomies? It turns out it does—at least to a certain extent. Welcome to the Salmonopolis 500.
Here, we combine slow-release chemical implants with acoustic telemetry tracking to reveal how environmentally realistic levels of cocaine and its main metabolite, benzoylecgonine, affect the movement of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) smolts in a large natural lake (Lake Vättern, Sweden). Benzoylecgonine exposure increased weekly movement rates of fish in the wild, with exposed fish swimming up to ∼1.9 times farther per week relative to controls. In addition, benzoylecgonine-exposed fish dispersed up to ∼12.3 km farther than control conspecifics.
Oh. They put the cocaine into the fish. Not a natural experiment.
Here, we present the findings of a global reconnaissance of pharmaceutical pollution in rivers. The study monitored 1,052 sampling sites along 258 rivers in 104 countries of all continents, thus representing the pharmaceutical fingerprint of 471.4 million people. We show that the presence of these contaminants in surface water poses a threat to environmental and/or human health in more than a quarter of the studied locations globally.
Cocaine did not show up as a major contaminant in this study. Tylenol does; it is #1.
The contaminants with the highest concentrations were paracetamol, caffeine, metformin, fexofenadine, sulfamethoxazole (antimicrobial), metronidazole (antimicrobial), and gabapentin
Comment
We take a lot of Tylenol and drink a lot of coffee, explaining the two drugs most frequently found in this study. Lots of people take metformin for type 2 diabetes. The more drugs we take, the more we pee out, and the more gets into rivers.
The investigators found huge socioeconomic inequities in drug contamination. There were drugs everywhere they sampled, even in Antarctica, but the highest levels were in low- and middle-income countries with unregulated pharmaceutical manufacturing plants, untreated sewage, and waste dumping.
Rivers with the lowest drug contamination were in remote areas with few people or those with access to modern medicine, were in places with effective wastewater treatment, or had so much flow that the drugs got diluted.
I’m not worried about cocaine in salmon. And I live in New York City which has outstanding water treatment.
I just bought the first cereal that dropped those colors and replaced them with vegetable dyes.
The company did this quietly. I had to look hard to find the green label in the upper right corner saying “colors from natural sources.” Compare the colors of the cereal (pretty close to what it actually looks like) to the original Trix colors, still on the market.
As for the cereals, both:
Are ultra-processed
Have artificial flavors and other chemical additives
Contain 12 grams of sugars per serving
Contain only 1 gram of fiber
Trix without artificial colors
Whole Grain Corn, Sugar, Corn Meal, Corn Syrup, Maltodextrin, Rice Flour, Canola And/Or Sunflower Oil, Salt, Color (Vegetable And Fruit Juice, Annatto Extract, Turmeric Extract And Other Color Added), Natural And Artificial Flavor, Trisodium Phosphate, Citric Acid, Malic Acid, Rosemary Extract. Vitamins And Minerals
Trix original, with artificial colors
Whole Grain Corn, Sugar, Rice Flour, Corn Syrup, Canola and/or Sunflower Oil, Salt, Trisodium Phosphate, Natural and Artificial Flavor, Red 40, Yellow 6, Blue 1 and Other Color Added, Citric Acid, Malic Acid, Rosemary Extract. Vitamins and Minerals
Comment
Removing the artificial dyes is a good idea, but does not convert Trix to a health food. Alas.
I don’t usually host guest posts here, but I read food safety lawyer Bill Marler’s blog and obtained his permission to reprint it. It should be obvious why I thought you should read it.
The people who find foodborne outbreaks are being fired, defunded, and disbanded — and the bugs do not care.
For more than thirty years I have represented the families on the other end of a foodborne outbreak — the parents of children on dialysis with hemolytic uremic syndrome, the survivors of a contaminated hamburger or a bag of spinach, the people left planning funerals. I built a career holding companies accountable when the food safety system failed. I never imagined the federal government itself would become one of the things that fails. Over the past year and a half, it has.
The cuts this administration has made to the FDA, the CDC, and the USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service are not abstract budget lines. They are going to get people sick, and some of them are going to die. The cruelest part is that it is all being done under a banner that reads “Make America Healthy Again.”
Consider the FDA, which polices roughly 80 percent of our food. It lost nearly 3,900 employees in 2025 alone, part of an HHS purge of some 20,000 jobs. It began in February with what the agency’s own deputy commissioner for human foods called the “indiscriminate” firing of 89 people from the food program — after which he resigned, saying it was “fruitless” to continue. The administration fired so blindly that it had to scramble to rehire the official in charge of infant formula safety.
By March, HHS planned to cut a fifth of the FDA’s workforce, including more than 170 people from inspections and investigations. Understand what that means. In 2024 the FDA had all of 443 inspectors to cover more than 36,000 food facilities at home and abroad — against the roughly 1,500 it says it actually needs. We were already running on fumes. ProPublica found that foreign food inspections fell by nearly half in early 2025. We are importing more food than ever and looking at less of it.
Then there is the surveillance — the quiet, unglamorous detective work that is the entire ballgame in my world. By the time a family calls me, public health investigators have usually already connected a sick child in Ohio to a sick adult in Oregon and traced both to a single contaminated lot. On July 1, the CDC gutted that capacity, scaling its FoodNet surveillance network back from eight pathogens to two. It stopped actively tracking Campylobacter, Listeria, and four others. Listeria — the same pathogen that, in the Boar’s Head outbreak just last year, caused the deadliest listeriosis outbreak in over a decade. We are turning off the smoke detectors and telling ourselves the house won’t burn.
The USDA has done its part. Its inspection service shed hundreds of positions while line speeds at some slaughterhouses climb and inspectors step back — fewer people asked to catch more contamination moving faster. And in a move that should alarm anyone who believes in evidence, the department disbanded the two scientific advisory committees that had guided federal food safety policy for decades, one of them since 1971. Their combined cost was about $300,000 a year. One was, at the moment it was dissolved, reviewing how to keep Listeria out of deli meat. That work simply stopped. For good measure, FSIS withdrew its proposed rule to limit Salmonella in raw poultry — a pathogen that sickens more than a million Americans a year — after years of work.
I want to be fair. No one in Washington woke up wanting to poison a child, and the food safety system was underfunded long before this administration; I have said so under presidents of both parties. But you cannot fire the inspectors, blind the surveillance, suspend the lab testing, dismiss the scientists, and abandon the rule making all at once and still claim that food safety is a priority. Actions are what count, and these all point one direction.
Here is what three decades have taught me. Outbreaks do not announce themselves. They are found by people — inspectors who walk the plants, epidemiologists who connect the dots, technicians who confirm the strain. Take those people away and the outbreaks still come. We just find them later, after more children are on dialysis and more families are planning funerals instead of birthday parties. The bacteria do not care about budget cuts. They never have.
I have spent my life suing companies that put profit ahead of safety. If these cuts stand, I expect to be busier than ever. That is the worst thing I could possibly tell you.
Information about the Aspen Ideas Festival is here. I am scheduled for a session, The American Wellness Paradox, currently scheduled from 11:00-11:50 a.m., at the East Lawn Tent. This will be a discussion with senior HHS policy advisor, Calley Means. Here’s the blurb on it: “Americans are spending more than ever on healthcare, supplements, wellness trends, and “clean eating,” yet rates of chronic disease and metabolic illness continue to climb. As skepticism fuels the rise of movements like MAHA, debates over what Americans should eat have become deeply cultural, political, and economic. Two influential voices with sharply different perspectives on nutrition and food science explore how food systems, farming practices, consumer culture, and the wellness industry collided to create one of the defining public health debates of our time.”