I’m keynoting the workship on Food, Ethics, Politics at 4:00 with a reception to follow. My talk, “”Food, Ethics, Politics: The View from 2022,” will be in the Andlinger Center for Energy and the Environment, Maeder Hall, Room 002. This event is part of the University Center for Human Values (UCHV) Conferences, Workshops & Special Events. To register to attend, click here.
Oxfam’s new corporate accountability initiative: Behind the Brands
Oxfam is an international relief and development organization. It is concerned about what the top ten global food companies—Associated British Foods, Coca Cola, Danone, General Mills, Kellogg, Mars, Mondelez, Nestlé, Pepsico and Unilever—are doing about social and environmental policies to:
- Ensure the rights of the workers and farmers who grow their ingredients
- Protect women’s rights
- Manage land and water use
- Prevent climate change
- Ensure the transparency of their supply chains
- Ensure the transparency of their policies and operations.
Oxfam finds the Big Ten companies to rank from so-so to poor on these measures. The overall results?
- None of the companies are committed to women’s rights throughout their supply chains.
- None have adequate policies to protect local communities from land and water grabs.
- All are overly secretive about their agricultural supply chains.
- Few have policies in place to limit their impact on local water sources.
- All have taken steps to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
- None are committed to pay a fair price to farmers (only Unilever has specific supplier guidelines).
Oxfam intends to monitor companies’ responses and to adjust scores accordingly. It will have plenty of work to do.
Does Oxfam think companies will voluntarily take actions that might reduce their bottom lines? Will its scorecard encourage voluntary action? I’m not optimistic.
The first company to respond, Associated British Foods, terms Oxfam’s charges “ridiculous.”