by Marion Nestle
Mar 7 2013

Lancet series on chronic diseases, many of them diet-related

The Lancet has just published a series of articles on non-communicable diseases (NCDs) the collective term for heart disease, type 2 diabetes, and other chronic conditions caused in large part by poor diets, lack of physical activity, or cigarettes or alcohol.

Since food politics is a big part of this discussion, these papers are worth a look.  For example, as editor Richard Horton explains in his editorial:

So where are the global conferences on NCDs, the research meetings, the task forces, the grand challenges initiated by funders and foundations? They don’t exist. We, the global health community, understand that chronic diseases are a present danger to the health of our societies. Yet we are unable to translate that understanding into real political action. We cannot quite bring ourselves to put heart disease, stroke, cancer, chronic respiratory disease, diabetes, or mental ill-health, together with their associated risk factors, on an equal footing with childhood pneumonia and diarrhoea, preventable maternal death, or epidemics of AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria. The disconnect between the reality of people’s lives in countries and the concerns of professional and political leaders has rarely been greater.

Here are the papers in this series.  Read them and ponder.

Independent global accountability for NCDs

Robert Beaglehole, Ruth Bonita, Richard Horton

Full Text | PDF

NCDs: a challenge to sustainable human development

Helen Clark

Full Text | PDF

Embedding non-communicable diseases in the post-2015 development agenda

George Alleyne, Agnes Binagwaho, Andy Haines, Selim Jahan, Rachel Nugent, Ariella Rojhani, David Stuckler, for The Lancet NCD Action Group

Summary | Full Text | PDF

Country actions to meet UN commitments on non-communicable diseases: a stepwise approach

Ruth Bonita, Roger Magnusson, Pascal Bovet, Dong Zhao, Deborah C Malta, Robert Geneau, Il Suh, Kavumpurathu Raman Thankappan, Martin McKee, James Hospedales, Maximilian de Courten, Simon Capewell, Robert Beaglehole, on behalf of The Lancet NCD Action Group

Summary | Full Text | PDF

Inequalities in non-communicable diseases and effective responses

Mariachiara Di Cesare, Young-Ho Khang, Perviz Asaria, Tony Blakely, Melanie J Cowan, Farshad Farzadfar, Ramiro Guerrero, Nayu Ikeda, Catherine Kyobutungi, Kelias P Msyamboza, Sophal Oum, John W Lynch, Michael G Marmot, Majid Ezzati, on behalf of The Lancet NCD Action Group

Summary | Full Text | PDF

Profits and pandemics: prevention of harmful effects of tobacco, alcohol, and ultra-processed food and drink industries

Rob Moodie, David Stuckler, Carlos Monteiro, Nick Sheron, Bruce Neal, Thaksaphon Thamarangsi, Paul Lincoln, Sally Casswell, on behalf of The Lancet NCD Action Group

Summary | Full Text | PDF

Promotion of access to essential medicines for non-communicable diseases: practical implications of the UN Political Declaration

Hans V Hogerzeil, Jonathan Liberman, Veronika J Wirtz, Sandeep P Kishore, Sakthi Selvaraj, Rachel Kiddell-Monroe, Faith N Mwangi-Powell, Tido von Schoen-Angerer

Summary | Full Text | PDF

Improving responsiveness of health systems to non-communicable diseases

Rifat Atun, Shabbar Jaffar, Sania Nishtar, Felicia M Knaul, Mauricio L Barreto, Moffat Nyirenda, Nicholas Banatvala, Peter Piot

Summary | Full Text | PDF

Comments

  • Laura Collins
  • March 7, 2013
  • 2:57 pm

This is interesting. I have been wanting to see how diet ties in to all the increases of illnesses

[...] The ever-influential Lancet has published a series on non-communicable diseases (many of which are associated with dietary diversity). Marion Nestle has the details. [...]

  • Don
  • March 8, 2013
  • 6:10 pm

Yes, and with Monsanto GMO frankenfoods becoming an ever increasing presence in the grocery stores, I am sure that the number of chronic diseases linked to our diet is only going to increase. I mean who actually believes turning corn into bt-toxin production factories is a good idea?

  • Sue
  • March 10, 2013
  • 9:29 am

Well, we all know it’s about the money and genetically modified foods make people rich – the heck with the consequences.

  • Lee
  • March 12, 2013
  • 9:18 am

Hi
You would of thought more people would of cottoned on by now that they have to eat better for a better life. It is not just the lancet but so many studies have linked a bad diet to illness. People seem to be just blocking it out because it is not what they want to here. The thing for me is if you eat healthily you feel so much better for it. I know it can cost a bit more but surely that is a small price to pay for a better chance of living to old age.

Keep it up lee

  • Sarah
  • March 15, 2013
  • 7:04 am

I have to agree with Sue that it’s all about money. They know that throwing enough mud at the wall some of it will stick and it is easier to become hooked on the unhealthy food than the healthy food.

Hi Marion,

Thanks for the papers. I cut out lots of processed foods from my diet about four years ago, and my friends can’t help but remark at how young I look. Inasmuch as we can’t stop the production of GM foods, we as consumers really need to educate ourselves on the dangers of these foods. Nutrition is supposed to be life-affirming, not the other way around. Great blog!

Alana

Leave a comment