by Marion Nestle
Aug 24 2009

Smart Choices: 44% sugar calories!

You may recall my previous posts about the new Smart Choices program.  This program was developed by food processors to identify products that are ostensibly “better for you”  because they supposedly contain more good nutrients and fewer bad ones.  This program is about marketing processed foods and I wouldn’t ordinarily take it seriously except that several nutrition professional associations are involved in this program and the American Society of Nutrition is managing it.  In effect, this means that nutritionists are endorsing products that bear the Smart Choices logo.

So what products are nutritionists endorsing?  I went grocery shopping last week and bought my first Smart Choice product: Froot Loops!

Froot Loops

Froot Loops

Look for the check mark in the upper right of the package.  Frosted Flakes also qualifies for this logo, and do take a look at what else is on the approved list.

A close look a the Nutrition Facts label of Froot Loops shows that it has 12 grams of added sugars in a 110-calorie serving.  That’s 44% of the calories (12 times 4 calories per gram divided by 110).  The usual program maximum for sugar is 25% of calories but it makes an exception for sugary breakfast cereals.  Note that the fiber content is less than one gram per serving, which makes this an especially low-fiber cereal.

Look at the amounts of sugar and fiber.OK.  I understand that companies want to market their processed foods, but I cannot understand why nutrition societies thought it would be a good idea to get involved with this marketing scheme.  It isn’t.  The American Society of Nutrition gets paid to manage this program.  It should not be doing this.

But, you may well ask, where is the FDA in regulating what goes on package labels?

Good news: I am happy to report that our new FDA is on the job!  FDA officials have written a letter to the manager of the program.  Although the letter is worded gently, I interpret its language as putting the program on high alert:

FDA and FSIS would be concerned if any FOP [Front of Package] labeling systems used criteria that were not stringent enough to protect consumers against misleading claims; were inconsistent with the Dietary Guidelines for Americans; or had the effect of encouraging consumers to choose highly processed foods and refined grains instead of fruits, vegetables, and whole grains [my emphasis].

Update August 25: I received an interesting e-mail message from a member of the Keystone group that developed the Smart Choices program.  The message confirms that this program is a scheme to make junk foods look healthy.  It says:

Glad to see your posting about Froot Loops! The negotiations over criteria were interesting. Lots of good debate on various points, but when the companies put their foot down, that was it; end of discussion. And sugar in cereals was one such point. Others included the non-necessity for breads, etc. to contain half or more whole grains and the acceptance of fortification to meet the nutrient requirement.

In other words, some people in the group argued that breads needed to contain at least half a serving of whole grains to quality and that added vitamins and minerals should not count toward qualification.  Too bad for them.  I guess the companies put down feet.  But why didn’t they speak up then?  And why aren’t they speaking up now?

Comments

Heartily concur….

Quite apart from the misleading claims… the pack design is a complete dog’s breakfast….

Keep up the great work, Marion.

  • Andrea
  • August 24, 2009
  • 12:34 pm

Yet another reason you’re my fav.

  • Sheila
  • August 24, 2009
  • 12:54 pm

So, tiny fiber, much sugar, tiny protein,…I’m not understanding what makes this cereal such a smart choice in the eyes of the certifying panel.

Couldn’t agree more!

Health claims–some bordering on the verge of marketing foods as drugs–have humbled and confused people already quite baffled by nutrition science, and it becomes easy to leap to erroneous conclusions about what’s good to eat.

  • Cindy
  • August 24, 2009
  • 3:18 pm

There doesn’t seem to be a link to the UK product.

  • Janet Camp
  • August 24, 2009
  • 3:54 pm

So Froot Loops are a “healthy choice” as opposed to what–the box they come in? It probably has more fiber!

Can you get this on Huff Post?

  • Leah McGrath, RD, LDN
  • August 24, 2009
  • 4:13 pm

This is one dietitian (not nutritionist) who definitely doesn’t endorse this!

  • Cathy Richards
  • August 24, 2009
  • 4:49 pm

Have always thought the UK system was the best. It’s also better than Katz’ NQI, which by the way companies would have to pay for to get their products rated with — thus another marketing system only available to companies that can afford it, and only for the products they pay for getting the rating (unless grocery chains pay for it….right…)

[...] Choice-marked Fruit Loops with 1/2 cup nonfat milk, the one that Marion Nestle writes about here: Food Politics » Smart Choices: 44% sugar calories! and I’ll give our breakfast the disadvantage of going organic. So when Emma gets older and [...]

  • Janet
  • August 25, 2009
  • 11:01 am

One look at the ingredients list- sugar, trans fat, artificial colors and flavors, and BHT tells that this should not be consumed by anyone, let alone be a “Smart Choice”.
The American Society of Nutrition should be pushing for real food, not processed junk. This whole thing is very sad.

  • Lisa
  • August 25, 2009
  • 12:35 pm

Outrageous and upsetting. As the parent of three sugar-sensitive children, I’m more and more inclined to just make everything myself. They have developed progressive allergies over the years and I’m convinced, anectodally, that the root of the allergies are due to this kind of stuff that’s added to almost all mass produced/marketed products. Thanks for the alert on this!

  • Bobby
  • August 25, 2009
  • 3:56 pm

I’m waiting for organic froot loops… that’ll confuse the shoppers. “mommy, mommy it’s organic, mommy mommy it’s organic…””

  • davidk
  • September 5, 2009
  • 11:21 am

All 203 cereals on the “Smart Choices” list are produced by three companies: General Mills, Kelloggs, and Quaker.

What does that tell you?

[...] had seen my previous blog post on the Smart Choices program, and wanted me to know that Froot Loops has been reformulated to [...]

[...] had seen my previous blog post on the Smart Choices program, and wanted me to know that Froot Loops has been reformulated to [...]

The food industry is no friend to health. Go to the produce aisle please everyone.

[...] There has been a lot of attention given to nutrition rating systems of late, fueled by the launch of the controversial Smart Choices rating system.  The controversy of the smart choices program, in brief,  is that the criteria for what gets labelled a ¨smart choice¨ seem somewhat flimsy.  For instance Marion Nestle examines the ¨smart choice¨ Froot Loops in this post here. [...]

[...] “Smart Choices: 44% sugar calories!” Marion Nestle, Food Politics [...]

OMG, Froot Loops! On that list? No way, I would say that you should only eat meat, vegetables and fruits in order to be healthy.

[...] advocates like Marion Nestle have raised the question of how Froot Loops could have possibly been included in this program, since, well, sugar is the [...]

[...] I borrowed the following Nutrition Facts Label for Fruit Loops from Marion Nestle: [...]

Leave a comment