by Marion Nestle

Currently browsing posts about: Preemption

Apr 29 2026

Preempting the GRAS loophole: not a good idea

One of the reasons for Monday’s rally at the Supreme Court (see Monday’s post) is the food industry’s efforts to be able to continue to use whatever additives it chooses, without regulatory oversight.

A press release from the Environmental Working Group warns: ‘FRESH’ and Affordable Foods Act is rotten to the core.

This refers to a a draft bill introduced by Rep. Kat Cammack (R-Fla.) designed to preempt all state food chemical laws.

States have been passing inconvenient laws banning food dyes and chemicals.  The industry want this to stop.

According to the EWG’s analysis, the bill would do things like this (and more):

  • Allow new food chemicals linked to cancer and reproductive harm to be considered “safe.”
  • Retroactively approve all food chemicals currently considered generally recognized as safe (GRAS).
  • Allow new chemicals to be added to food if the FDA does not respond to a GRAS notice within 90 days.
  • Allow new chemicals reviewed by industry-funded expert panels – including the flavor industry’s notorious “expert” panel – to be automatically GRAS and used in food immediately.

Under the “GRAS loophole,” which Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr, has vowed to close (this has not happened yet), chemical companies – not the FDA – decide whether a food chemical is safe. For new chemicals, companies submit a GRAS notice to the FDA, and the FDA responds with a “no questions” letter.

As an EWG analysis found, since 2000, almost all new chemicals – nearly 99% –  have come onto the market through the GRAS loophole.

The system is already inadequate; this act would make it worse (here’s my contribution to this discussion from more than a decade ago).

Helena Bottemiller Evich says in Food Fix: Food industry quietly advances its preemption push in Washington

Right now, preemption is becoming even more critical for industry because MAHA groups and consumer advocates have been having a ton of success in state legislatures. In many cases, the industry is actually getting creamed outside of Washington.

She notes that the New York legislature has just required companies to publicly disclose any additivies they self-determine to be GRAS (it also bans Red 3, propylparaben, and potassium bromate in the state).

This kind of action makes the food industry long for federal preemption.

Secretary Kennedy and the MAHA movement have promised to fix all this.  Will they be able to?

Stay tuned.

Nov 4 2025

Big Food wants federal preemption (blocking) of tougher state standards for chemicals in food

I first read about this in Food Business News: New coalition targets ‘ingredient transparency’

Major food, agricultural and consumer products trade groups and companies have given their support to Americans for Ingredient Transparency (AFIT), a new policy advocacy coalition seeking a uniform national standard for ingredient transparency…With many states now enacting or considering their own ingredient transparency laws, the goal is to avoid the emergence of “an ever-expanding patchwork of disjointed food, beverage and personal care regulations” that would sow confusion among US consumers, the coalition said.

Specifically, AFIT said it will focus on reform of the generally recognized as safe (GRAS) process, front-of-package labeling and QR codes….The group also said it seeks to amend the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act to establish the US Food and Drug Administration as “the sole entity setting the floor and ceiling for regulations on the marketing and sale of foods, beverages and over-the-counter products in the United States.”

Translation: The coalition wants a weak federal law to preempt (block) tougher state standards for GRAS qualification and front-of-pack labels.

US Right to Know explains what this is really about:  Americans for Ingredient Transparency: Product defense for unhealthy ultra-processed foods.  It shows:

Sarah Sorscher in Food Safety News calls this out for what it is: a front group aiming to weaken food safety rules.

But wait!  84 organizations have called on Congress to block preemption of states’ rights to regulate food chemicals .

I’m for this group.

Which side are you on?

Let your congressional representatives know.

Now.