I’m speaking with Fabio Parasecoli about his new book, Gastronativism: Food, Identity, Politics, at the Museum of the City of New York at a session chaired by Krishnendu Ray at 6:30 pm. Information is here and the ticketing link is here. This is a preview of the museum’s forthcoming exhibit, Food in New York: Bigger Than the Plate (opening September 16) and is co-presented by MOFAD (Museum of Food and Drink).
Sugar politics: The BMJ’s series “Spinning a web of influence”
BMJ (formerly the British Medical Journal) has just released an editorial and four papers on ties between the sugar industry and public health scientists who advise the government on health policy. Some health policies involve recommendations about intake of sugars.
The BMJ press release explains
Recipients of research funding from sugar and other related industries include members of the Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition (SACN), which is currently updating official advice on carbohydrates consumption, and researchers working for the Medical Research Council’s Human Nutrition Research unit (HNR). HNR scientists have received research funding and funding in kinds from companies including Coca-Cola, Mars, Nestlé, Sainsbury’s, the Institute of Brewing and Distilling, Weight Watchers International and others…Of the 40 scientists affiliated with SACN between 2001 and 2012, only 13 have had no interests to declare.
This, of course, is no different than what we see here. Food and beverage companies support food and nutrition research as well as professional societies, and conflicts of interest are rampant.
Even so, these well documented studies are alarming and worth serious attention. And be sure to look at the map.
- Sugar: spinning a web of influence
- Sugar’s web of influence 2: Biasing the science
- Sugar’s web of influence 3: Why the responsibility deal is a “dead duck” for sugar reduction
- Sugar’s web of influence 4: Mars and company: sweet heroes or villains?
- Map showing links between public health scientists and the sugar industry
MedPage has a nice summary (I’m quoted).
The furor over these articles
- UK scientists object to the accusations
- Responses to the BMJ
- BBC commentary on the dispute
- Susan Jebb responds
- The Obesity Society’s Position Opposing Ad Hominem Attacks (its term for articles like those in the BMJ)