Information about the Aspen Ideas Festival is here. I am scheduled for a session, The American Wellness Paradox, currently scheduled from 11:00-11:50 a.m., at the East Lawn Tent. This will be a discussion with senior HHS policy advisor, Calley Means. Here’s the blurb on it: “Americans are spending more than ever on healthcare, supplements, wellness trends, and “clean eating,” yet rates of chronic disease and metabolic illness continue to climb. As skepticism fuels the rise of movements like MAHA, debates over what Americans should eat have become deeply cultural, political, and economic. Two influential voices with sharply different perspectives on nutrition and food science explore how food systems, farming practices, consumer culture, and the wellness industry collided to create one of the defining public health debates of our time.”
Some hopeful news on the chemicals-in-food front
Three items for a happy Valentine’s day

I. Food animal producers are using fewer antibiotics
According to a report from the FDA, U.S. sales of antibiotic drugs decreased:
- By 33% from 2016 through 2017.
- By 43% from 2015 (the year of peak sales) through 2017.
- By 28% from 2009 (the first year of reported sales) through 2017.
Of antibiotic drugs sold, these estimated percentages were intended for use in these animals
- 42% for cattle
- 36% for pigs
- 12% for turkeys
- 5% for chickens
- 5% for other species or unknown
These percentages of these antibiotic drugs were intended for use in cattle
- 80% of cephalosporins
- 72% of sulfas
- 48% of aminoglycocides
- 44% of tetracyclines
These were intended for use in swine
- 84% of lincosamides
- 40% of macrolides
These were intended for use in turkey
61% of penicillins
II. The Farm Foundation and The Pew Charitable Trusts have produced this framework for judicious use of antibiotics.
III. USDA tests for pesticide residues mostly find low levels
USDA has issued its annual summary report on the results of its pesticide sampling of fresh and processed fruits and vegetables.
The good news: Half the samples tested had no detectable residues.
But try and get your head around this:
Three samples of kale (2 from California and 1 imported from Mexico) contained residues of 17 pesticides.
Excuse me, but 17 different pesticides to grow kale?
OK, “none of the residues found on the kale samples exceeded the established tolerances,” but still.
Could be worse, but could be a lot better.
Organics, anyone?

