Information about the Aspen Ideas Festival is here. I am scheduled for a session, The American Wellness Paradox, currently scheduled from 11:00-11:50 a.m., at the East Lawn Tent. This will be a discussion with senior HHS policy advisor, Calley Means. Here’s the blurb on it: “Americans are spending more than ever on healthcare, supplements, wellness trends, and “clean eating,” yet rates of chronic disease and metabolic illness continue to climb. As skepticism fuels the rise of movements like MAHA, debates over what Americans should eat have become deeply cultural, political, and economic. Two influential voices with sharply different perspectives on nutrition and food science explore how food systems, farming practices, consumer culture, and the wellness industry collided to create one of the defining public health debates of our time.”
Health claims on alcoholic beverages, exposed!
The California-based Marin Institute, “the alcohol industry watchdog,” has issued an enlightening new report: Questionable Health Claims by Alcohol Companies: From Protein Vodka to Weight-Loss Beer.
According to the Institute’s press release, “Major alcohol companies are exploiting ineffective or non-existent regulatory oversight with deceptive marketing and potentially dangerous products.
Some examples described in the report:
- Devotion Vodka (“Infused with Casein”)
- Fragoli strawberry liqueur (promoted with antioxidants)
- Absolut, Skyy, and Finlandia vodkas (“infused with natural flavors”)
- Michelob Ultra, and MGD 64 beer (promoted as fitness and weight-loss aids)
Or how about vodka advertised as “no sugar, gluten free, low calorie?” The Marin Institute points out that terms like these are “promoted as logical compliments to a healthy, fitness-oriented lifestyle, without a hint of irony.”
Irony? Check the illustrations!
As the report concludes, such marketing messages when applied to alcoholic beverages are “legally tenuous, morally unsound, and potentially dangerous.”
But don’t blame the FDA for this one. Alcoholic beverages are regulated by the Treasury Department because they are a lucrative source of revenue. Health claims sell products.
Treasury benefits more when companies sell more. This sounds to me like a clear conflict of interest. You?

