I’m speaking at the Aspen Ideas Festival: Health. I’ll be interviewed by Helena Bottemiller Evich of FoodFix from 9:00 to 9:50 a.m.. Topic: “Making sense of nutrition science.”
I am an avid reader of Jerry Hagstrom’s Hagstrom Report, which I subscribe to and consider well worth the price. He not only tracks farm and agriculture policy, but explains it in ways that I can actually understand.
Sometimes, his articles go to the National Journal and other places with open access. This one gives a lucid history of the farm bill along with the politics of the current congressional impasse.
The history matters because the farm bill is otherwise inexplicable.
Here’s how we got to this point:
Since then whenever Congress passes new farm bills, it suspends the 1938 and 1949 commodity titles for specific periods of time (the alternative would be to amend those laws, or pass new laws that will be permanent and difficult to change).
Where does SNAP fit in?
Hagstrom points out that SNAP does not have permanent authorization; it expires with the farm bill. But it is an entitlement, meaning that anyone who qualifies gets funded. This, however, requires congressional appropriations.
So everything is up to Congress, and none of the reasonable options look possible.
Sad. Infuriating, actually.