Nov
15
2007
U.S. food “insecurity”: is 11% OK?
Since 1995, the USDA has done census surveys of the extent of food “insecurity”–the euphemism it uses for not having enough food to eat–in the U.S. population. USDA has just released the 2006 survey, which finds 10.9% of the population–including about half a million children–to be food insecure. This percentage is about the same as in previous years. About half of the food insecure population gets federal food assistance, Food Stamps, WIC, or others. What about the other half?
Leave a comment
Next public appearance
Feb
15
2012
New York: NGO Working Group on Food and Hunger, U.N.
Policy lunch talk in the series “the future of global food policy,” UN church Centre, 777 UN Plaza @44th St and 1st Ave, 1:00-2:45.
Search
Related posts
Topics for this post
All Topics
5-a-Day
AAFP(American Academy of Family Physicians)
AAP(American Academy of Pediatrics)
Acrylamide
ACSH(American Council on Science and Health)
Activity
ADA(American Dietetic Association)
Addiction
Additives
Advocacy
Agave
Aging
Agriculture
AHA(American Heart Association)
Alcohol
Alice-Waters
Allergies
American-Diabetes-Association
Animals
Antibiotics
Antioxidants
Arsenic
Artificial-sweeteners
ASN(American Society of Nutrition)
Asthma
Açaí
Beef
Bill-Marler
Biofuel
Blogs
Books
Bottled-water
BPA(Bisphenol-A)
Bread
Breakfast
Breast-feeding
Brian-Wansink
Bribery
Burger-King
Caffeine
CAFOs(Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations)
calcium
Calorie-labeling
Calories
Campbell
Canada
Cancer
Candy
Cantaloupe
Carcinogens
Cargill
CCF(Center for Consumer Freedom)
CDC(Centers for Disease Control)
CDC(Centers for Disease Control)
Cereals
Charlie-Rose
Checkoff
Cheerios
Cheese
Chickens
China
Chinese-infant-formula
Chocolate
Cholesterol
Climate change
Cloned-animals
Coca-Cola
Coffee
Colbert
Comments-Monitoring-Policy
Comments-Policy-Monitoring
ConAgra
Conflicts-of-interest
Consolidation
Consumer Reports
Cookie-dough
Cooking
Cooking-measurements
COOL(Country of Origin Labeling)
Corn
CSPI(Center for Science in the Public Interest)
CSR(Corporate Social Responsibility)
Dairy
Del Monte
Denmark
Diabetes
Diet-and-dieting
Diet-and-energy-drinks
Diet-drugs
Dietary-Guidelines
Disney
E.coli
Eat-less-and-move-more
EatingLiberally
EFSA
EFSA(European Food Safety Authority)
Eggs
EPA
Eric-Schlosser
Ethanol
Ethics
Events
Excerpt
FAO
FAQ
Farm-bill
Farm-policy
Farm-workers
farmers markets
farms
Fast food
Fats-and-oils
FDA
feed efficiency
Fiber
films
First Amendment
Fish
Flaxseed
FMI(Food Marketing Institute)
Food
Food-and-Water-Watch
Food-art
Food-assistance
Food-availability
Food-choice
Food-colors
Food-composition
Food-crisis
Food-culture
Food-deserts
Food-guide
Food-Inc
Food-industry
Food-industry-regulation
Food-magazines
Food-marketing
Food-miles
Food-movement
Food-policy
Food-quality
Food-safety
Food-security
Food-stamps
Food-studies
Food-supply
Food-systems
Food-trade
Food-waste
FOP(Front-of-Package)Labels
Fortification
Framingham-Heart-Study
Fruits-and-vegetables
FTC (Federal Trade Commission)
Functional-foods
Futures-markets
GAO
GAO(Government Accountability Office)
Gardens
Gary-Taubes
General-Mills
Gluten
GM(Genetically Modified)
GMA(Grocery Manufacturers Association)
Grassfed
Green-food
HACCP(Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point)
Hannaford
Health-aura
Health-claims
Health-statistics
Heart-disease
HFCS (High Fructose Corn Syrup)
HHS(Department of Health and Human Services)
Hormones
Hugo drinks
Hydroponics
hyperactivity
IASO
India
Infant-formula
International
Interviews
IOM (Institute of Medicine)
iraq
Irradiation
IWG(Interagency Working Group)
Jamie-Oliver
Japan
Job-Ads
Joy-of-Cooking
Juice-drinks
juices
Junk food
Kellogg
Kelly-Brownell
KFC
Kids' diets
King-Corn
Korea
Kraft
krill
Label-scoring-systems
Labels
Lawsuits
Legislation
Let's Move!
Listeria
Lobbies
Local-food
Lévi-Strauss
Mad-cow-disease
Malnutrition
Manure
maps
Margarines
Marketing to kids
Mark Hegsted
Mars
McDonald's
meal frequency
Meat
Meat safety
Meat substitutes
media
Melamine
Mercury
Michael-Pollan
Michael-Taylor
military
Milk
Monsanto
Movies
MSG
MyPlate
Nanotechnology
Natural
neighborhoods
Nestlé
New-York-City
New-Zealand
Niman
Nutrient-availability
Nutrition-education
Nutrition-standards
Nutritionism
Obama
Obesity
Obesity-in-kids
Obesity-policy
Omega-3-fats
Organic-fish
Organic-standards
Organics
orthorexia
Oysters
Pakistan
Partnerships
Patents
Paula Deen
Peanut-butter
Peanuts
PepsiCo
personal responsibility
Pesticides
Peter Jennings
Pet food
Phil Lempert
Photos
Pistachios
pizza
Pork
Portion sizes
Potatoes
pregnancy
Pric
Price-fixing
Price-of-food
Probiotics
Processing
Protein
Public-health
Pyramid
Quotes from What to Eat
Radioactivity
Raw-foods
Raw-milk
rBGH
recipes
Red-Bull
Research
Restaurants
Revolving-door
Right-to-food
Rosa DeLauro
RWJ Foundation
S.510
Salmonella
Salt
San-Francisco-Chronicle
scho
School-food
Seeds
shrek
Single-food-agency
Slow Food
Smart Choices
Snack foods
Socioeconomic-factors
Soft drinks
soy
Spinach
Splenda
Sprouts
Starvation
Stevia
sticky
Sugar
Supermarkets
Supplements
Supreme court
Surveys
sushi
Sweeteners
Swine flu
Taste
Taxes
Techno-foods
Television
Thomas Friedan
Tim Lang
Tobacco
Tomatoes
Toxins
Trans-fat
Tufts
Twitter
Tyson-foods
United Nations
Urban-farming
USDA
Vegetables
Vegetarian-and-vegan
Vending-machines
Videos
Vitamin-water
Vitamins
Wall-Street
Walmart
Water
WHO(World Health Organization)
Whole Foods
Whole grains
WIC
World hunger
Yearly Kos
Yogurt

Comments
If it were grade in school 89% might be quite acceptable to a parent or student, but having, or not having enough food, seems unlikely to be fixed by the person studying just a little more.
My guess is we would all prefer it be 100%, and are equally frustrated with there being more food produced that we can actually eat — where does it all go?
Industrial food prices ought to be closely tied to oil prices, (albeit with a fair lag). Oil is now 10 times its 1999 cost, 5 times its 2002 cost and twice its 2004 cost. Food prices in the US are going to get worse, and food insecurity is going to go up.
When I click the link, it takes me to an article on diabetes drugs. Could you check the link, please?
Thank you.
Mark D. asks where all the surplus food goes (I, too, am bothered that 11% goes without enough food when more than enough is produced). One place is the dumpster behind the average supermarket. And I’m not talking about spoiled food, but perfectly edible, surplus food that is discarded to make way for the new food that was just loaded off the truck.
While I’m not a “freegan”, I’ve been running across a lot of freegan info lately. Freegans make claims about the huge amount of perfectly edible fresh food is discarded every single day. From what I have seen, it is probably true.
“Despite our society’s sterotypes about garbage, the goods recovered by freegans are safe, useable, clean, and in perfect or near-perfect condition, a symptom of a throwaway culture that encourages us to constantly replace our older goods with newer ones, and where retailers plan high-volume product disposal as part of their economic model. ” Source: http://freegan.info/
Some communities have organizations which collect such food items and distribute them to suitable recipients. But a bigger question is why every community doesn’t have such a system. Our local CRC cannot handle fresh foods because they don’t have the proper facilities to store them, which is only one of the issues. So most of the foods they distribute are packaged foods.
This is off-topic somewhat, but it has been on my mind as holiday food drives gear up this month. My son’s Cub Scout pack has periodic food drives to fill the local Community Resources Center’s truck with food for their pantry. The boys ask shoppers entering the store to consider purchasing non-perishables donations (food, household goods/cleaners, baby supplies, etc.) to add to the drive on their way out of the store. Every drive I have attended, the single most commonly donated item is a can of corn! Why corn? I know it is cheap, but starchy corn, instead of tomatoes or green beans, or even pinto beans?
The other thing I have noticed is that can of corn is usually donated by a person with a huge cart full of food bags, while the larger ticket donations, like diapers, household cleaning supplies, toilet paper, tuna, peanut butter, cans of stew, etc., are more often donated by the person who bought just a few items for themselves (the donations are often much more than their pursonal purchases). I’m not trying to make a judgment (ok, with the canned corn, I am) but I’m interested in the donation patterns.
BTW, my donations are usually protein foods (they seem to get an excess proportion of starch foods donations at these drives, but limited protein foods: tuna & salmon pouches, canned meats, nut butters, stews, etc. Our CRC particularly likes single serve items for their transient clients. Some seniors prefer these items, too.
No, 11% food insecure is not acceptable. I would like more information about why the other half of this group is not receiving assistance. It sounds like they could qualify for Food Stamps, but I have not seen the specific numbers/reasons why these people are not getting assistance. Perhaps there are societal or access obstacles we could resolve?
I would also like more information about how communities are addressing the problem successfully. Perhaps they have some ideas the rest of us could implement.
this is for anna about the canned corn. i myself have donated canned corn. my reason? i wasn ‘t thinking heath as much as which vegetable is probably liked the most and particularly by children. i really was not thinking about the starch content in it. did this help you?