Nov
15
2007
U.S. food “insecurity”: is 11% OK?
Since 1995, the USDA has done census surveys of the extent of food “insecurity”–the euphemism it uses for not having enough food to eat–in the U.S. population. USDA has just released the 2006 survey, which finds 10.9% of the population–including about half a million children–to be food insecure. This percentage is about the same as in previous years. About half of the food insecure population gets federal food assistance, Food Stamps, WIC, or others. What about the other half?
Leave a comment
Next public appearance
Sep
15
2010
Syracuse, NY: Upstate Medical University
This will be Public Health Grand Rounds at SUNY-Upstate Medical University’s Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, co-sponsored with Syracuse University, 4:00 p.m.
Search
Related posts
Topics for this post
All Topics
(ACSH) American Council on Science and Health
5 a Day
AAFP (American Academy of Family Physicians)
Acrylamide
Activity
Addiction
Additives
Advocacy
Aging
Agriculture
AHA (American Heart Association)
Alcohol
Alice Waters
Allergies
American Academy of Pediatrics
American Dietetic Association
American Heart Association
Animals
Antibiotics
antioxidant
Antioxidants
Artificial sweeteners
ASN (American Society of Nutrition)
Asthma
Açaí
Beef
Bill Marler
Biofuel
Bisphenol A
blogs
Books
Bottled water
bpa
Breakfast
Breast feeding
Brian Wansink
Bribery
Burger King
Caffeine
CAFOs
calcium
calore labeling
Calorie labeling
Calories
Canada
Cancer
Candy
Carcinogens
Cargill
CCF (Center for Consumer Freedom)
CDC (Centers for Disease Control)
Cereals
Charlie Rose
Cheerios
Cheese
Chickens
China
Chinese infant formula
Chocolate
Cholesterol
Climate change
Cloned animals
Coca Cola
Colbert
consolidation
Cookie dough
Cooking
Cooking measurements
COOL (Country of Origin Labeling)
Corn
Corn sweeteners
corrections
Costs
CSPI (Center for Science in the Public Interest)
CSR (Corporate social responsibility)
Dairy
denmark
Diabetes
diet
Diet and energy drinks
dietary advice
Dietary guidelines
diet drugs
Diets
Diet sodas
Disney
E. coli
EatingLiberally
Eat less & move more
EFSA
EFSA (European Food Safety Authority)
eggs
energy drinks
Eric Schlosser
Ethanol
Events
Excerpt
F&V
FAQ
farmers markets
Farm po
Farm policy
farms
Fast food
Fats and oils
FDA
feed efficiency
Fiber
films
First Amendment
Fish
Flaxseed
Food
Food and Water Watch
Food art
Food assistance
Food availability
Food choice
Food colors
Food Composition
Food crisis
Food culture
Food deserts
Food Inc
Food industry
Food industry regulation
Food magazines
Food marketing
Food miles
Food movement
Food policy
Food quality
Food safety
Food security
Food stamps
Food studies
food supply
Food systems
food trade
food waste
Framingham Heart Study
Fruits & vegetables
FTC (Federal Trade Commission)
Functional foods
Futures markets
GAO
Gardens
Gary Taubes
General Mills
Gluten
GM (Genetically Modified)
GMA (Grocery Manufacturers Association)
Grassfed
Green food
HACCP
Hannaford
Health aura
Health claims
health statistics
Heart disease
HFCS (High Fructose Corn Syrup)
HHS (Department of Health and Human Services)
Hormones
Hugo drinks
hyperactivity
Inc.
India
Infant formula
International
Interviews
IOM (Institute of Medicine)
iraq
irradiation
Jamie Oliver
Japan
Job Ads
Joy of Cooking
Juice drinks
juices
Junk food
Kellogg
Kelly Brownell
KFC
Kids' diets
King Corn
Korea
Kraft
krill
Labels
Label scoring systems
Lawsuits
Legislation
Lobbies
Local food
Lévi-Strauss
Mad cow
Malnutrition
Manure
maps
Margarines
Marketing to kids
Mark Hegsted
Mars
McDonald's
meal frequency
Meat
Meat safety
Meat substitutes
media
Melamine
Mercury
Michael Pollan
Michael Taylor
military
Milk
Monsanto
move more
Movies
MSG
Nanotechnology
Natural
neighborhoods
Nestlé
New York City
New Zealand
Niman
Nutrition education
Nutritionism
Obama
Obesity
Obesity in kids
obesity policy
Omega 3 Fats
Organic fish
Organics
Organic standards
orthorexia
Oysters
Pakistan
Partnerships
Patents
Peanut butter
Peanuts
PepsiCo
personal responsibility
Pesticides
Peter Jennings
Pet food
Phil Lempert
Photos
Pistachios
pizza
Pork
Portion sizes
potatoes
pregnancy
Price fixing
Price of food
prices
Probiotics
Public health
Pyramid
Quotes from What to Eat
Raw milk
recipes
Red Bull
Restaurants
Revolving door
Rosa DeLauro
RWJ Foundation
S.510
Salmonella
Salt
San Francisco Chronicle
School food
Seeds
shrek
Single food agency
Slow Food
Smart Choices
Soft drinks
soy
spinach
splenda
Sponsorship
starvation
Stevia
sticky
Sugar
Supermarkets
Supplements
Supreme court
Surveys
sushi
sweeteners
Swine flu
Taste
Taxes
techno foods
Television
Thomas Friedan
Tim Lang
Tobacco
Tomatoes
toxins
Trans fat
Tufts
Twitter
Tyson foods
USDA
vegetables
Vegetarian and vegan
Vending machines
Videos
Vitamins
vitamin water
Wall street
Wal Mart
water
WHO
Whole Foods
Whole Grains
WIC
World hunger
Yearly Kos
Yogurt

Comments
If it were grade in school 89% might be quite acceptable to a parent or student, but having, or not having enough food, seems unlikely to be fixed by the person studying just a little more.
My guess is we would all prefer it be 100%, and are equally frustrated with there being more food produced that we can actually eat — where does it all go?
Industrial food prices ought to be closely tied to oil prices, (albeit with a fair lag). Oil is now 10 times its 1999 cost, 5 times its 2002 cost and twice its 2004 cost. Food prices in the US are going to get worse, and food insecurity is going to go up.
When I click the link, it takes me to an article on diabetes drugs. Could you check the link, please?
Thank you.
Mark D. asks where all the surplus food goes (I, too, am bothered that 11% goes without enough food when more than enough is produced). One place is the dumpster behind the average supermarket. And I’m not talking about spoiled food, but perfectly edible, surplus food that is discarded to make way for the new food that was just loaded off the truck.
While I’m not a “freegan”, I’ve been running across a lot of freegan info lately. Freegans make claims about the huge amount of perfectly edible fresh food is discarded every single day. From what I have seen, it is probably true.
“Despite our society’s sterotypes about garbage, the goods recovered by freegans are safe, useable, clean, and in perfect or near-perfect condition, a symptom of a throwaway culture that encourages us to constantly replace our older goods with newer ones, and where retailers plan high-volume product disposal as part of their economic model. ” Source: http://freegan.info/
Some communities have organizations which collect such food items and distribute them to suitable recipients. But a bigger question is why every community doesn’t have such a system. Our local CRC cannot handle fresh foods because they don’t have the proper facilities to store them, which is only one of the issues. So most of the foods they distribute are packaged foods.
This is off-topic somewhat, but it has been on my mind as holiday food drives gear up this month. My son’s Cub Scout pack has periodic food drives to fill the local Community Resources Center’s truck with food for their pantry. The boys ask shoppers entering the store to consider purchasing non-perishables donations (food, household goods/cleaners, baby supplies, etc.) to add to the drive on their way out of the store. Every drive I have attended, the single most commonly donated item is a can of corn! Why corn? I know it is cheap, but starchy corn, instead of tomatoes or green beans, or even pinto beans?
The other thing I have noticed is that can of corn is usually donated by a person with a huge cart full of food bags, while the larger ticket donations, like diapers, household cleaning supplies, toilet paper, tuna, peanut butter, cans of stew, etc., are more often donated by the person who bought just a few items for themselves (the donations are often much more than their pursonal purchases). I’m not trying to make a judgment (ok, with the canned corn, I am) but I’m interested in the donation patterns.
BTW, my donations are usually protein foods (they seem to get an excess proportion of starch foods donations at these drives, but limited protein foods: tuna & salmon pouches, canned meats, nut butters, stews, etc. Our CRC particularly likes single serve items for their transient clients. Some seniors prefer these items, too.
No, 11% food insecure is not acceptable. I would like more information about why the other half of this group is not receiving assistance. It sounds like they could qualify for Food Stamps, but I have not seen the specific numbers/reasons why these people are not getting assistance. Perhaps there are societal or access obstacles we could resolve?
I would also like more information about how communities are addressing the problem successfully. Perhaps they have some ideas the rest of us could implement.
this is for anna about the canned corn. i myself have donated canned corn. my reason? i wasn ‘t thinking heath as much as which vegetable is probably liked the most and particularly by children. i really was not thinking about the starch content in it. did this help you?