by Marion Nestle
Feb 1 2010

The Supreme Court and food politics: update

I commented earlier on the Supreme Court’s decision to allow unlimited corporate spending on election campaigns on the grounds of free speech.  If a picture is indeed worth a thousand words, try this (I wish I knew its source):

Update February 2: Thanks for Dan M. for posting this site as the source: “The Future in History.”

  • Jenna

    It looks like it’s a photo straight from Adbusters!

  • Jim Purdy
  • Dr. Veronica

    i’ll Twitte this post. people mast see this! vw

  • Subert


    Have seen many variations of this all over the web. A great way to bridge the budget gaps for governemnt official’s apparel during the big “freeze”. Actually, not that funny, as it’s a probably not too much of a stretch regarding what’s next for our socitey…

  • lisi

    That’s very disheartening to hear, and the picture is just sad…

  • Pingback: The New Supreme Court sponsored by … « Ross E. Young()

  • Tanka

    Disgusting. There are too many facists like you in the world. Why are you against freedom?

  • Pingback: Stop Blogging and Cook » SUPER MARKET WARS()

  • alp

    This is stupid. for years now big corporations have been filling the pockets of democrats in one way or another. do you guys even know why democrats are pissed at this? it levels the playing field more then you could imagine.

  • Dan M.
  • Chris MacDonald

    Cute pic! lol. But just to be clear, the Court *didn’t make a “decision to allow unlimited corporate spending on election campaigns.” There are still limits on campaign contributions. Nothing changed, there. The court only struck down part of the law on *independent* political speech.

    The two most recent entries on my blog are both about this:

  • Emily

    Why are people who think Marion is a facist even reading her blog? Curious.

  • Pingback: Stuff I find worth looking at, let me know if you do too – February 8, 2010 : ryanopaz()