I’m speaking at the Aspen Ideas Festival: Health. I’ll be interviewed by Helena Bottemiller Evich of FoodFix from 9:00 to 9:50 a.m.. Topic: “Making sense of nutrition science.”
The FDA is an agency within the Department of Health and Human Services, now headed by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. It is getting busy on carrying out Secretary Kennedy’s stated agenda. It took four actions of interest last week. Check out #3; it requires action.
I. Approved Three Food Colors from Natural Sources
Since the HHS and FDA announcement last month during a press conference at HHS on petroleum-based food dyes, more U.S. food manufacturers have committed to removing them within the FDA’s set time frame of the end of next year.
“On April 22, I said the FDA would soon approve several new color additives and would accelerate our review of others. I’m pleased to report that promises made, have been promises kept,” said FDA Commissioner Martin A. Makary, M.D., M.P.H. “FDA staff have been moving quickly to expedite the publication of these decisions, underscoring our serious intent to transition away from petroleum-based dyes in the food supply and provide new colors from natural sources.”
FDA approved color additive petitions for:
II. Announced top priorities for the Human Foods Program
FoodNavigator-USA report that Mark Hartman, who directs the new Office of Food Chemical Safety, Dietary Supplements, and Innovation, says the FDA soon will:
III. Extended the comment period for front-of-package labeling until July 15
We are taking this action in response to requests to extend the comment period to allow interested parties additional time to submit comments. Comments should be submitted to Regulations.gov and identified with the docket number FDA-2024-N-2910.
Recall: This is what the Biden FDA proposed. Here’s what I said about it (basically, we need something better).
Here’s a real opportunity. If you want a front-of-package warning label like those in Latin America, here’s your chance to weigh in.
RFK Jr says he wants to Make America Healthy Again. One way to do that is to discourage sales of food products high in saturated fat, sodium, and added sugars, but also discourage sales of ultra-processed foods. Identifying foods as ultra-processed, on the basis of their chemical additives as well as their fat, sugar, and salt, would be an excellent step forward.
If you like the warning labels used in Latin American countries, send a note to the FDA Docket. You have until July 15 to do that.
IV. Announced a joint research initiative with NIH to address, among other unspecified questions,
Comment
OK. This represents action or proposed action. My question: What will the FDA actually do? I’m particularly interested in the joint NIH research initiative on ultra-processed foods. Will NIH reverse its stance on Kevin Hall, whose research aimed to answer precisely that question? I will be watching all this with much curiosity.