I’m speaking at the Aspen Ideas Festival: Health. I’ll be interviewed by Helena Bottemiller Evich of FoodFix from 9:00 to 9:50 a.m.. Topic: “Making sense of nutrition science.”
I am way behind on posting all the industry-funded studies sent to me and collected, so will share a week’s worth of fruit studies . This is to emphasize the obvious point that fruit is good for you, but one is not necessarily better than another–except to its marketers. Enjoy!
Here’s the first: strawberries.
I heard about this from two news releases, and because it was sent to me by Charles Platkin, Executive Director, Center for Food as Medicine and Distinguished Lecturer at Hunter College, City University of New York.
Wow. This is exciting. I had strawberries with my cereal for breakfast this morning.
I could not wait to read the study.
Uh oh. Not yet published. But given in a poster session at the American Society for Nutrition meetings in Boston last month.
Comment: Of course it was. Who else would care about the effects of strawberry powder. Not that no other fruit powders were tested; I would expect all of them to produce similar effects, whatever those effects might be. Given that the control group performed better on memory tests, you could interpret the results as not particularly meaningful. But one characteristic of industry funded studies is to put a positive spin on whatever results occur. We can argue about the methods when the study is actually published. In the meantime, we have press releases.
Oh. And my morning strawberries were somewhat local, red all the way through, and tasted like strawberries. Do I feel smarter as a result? Sure, why not.