The Fish Counter: coming June 10
My new book, The Fish Counter, comes out June 10. I will say more about it then. In the meantime…
My interview about it with Nutrition Action’s Bonnie Liebman.
My new book, The Fish Counter, comes out June 10. I will say more about it then. In the meantime…
My interview about it with Nutrition Action’s Bonnie Liebman.
I’ve been collecting items on new and emerging food products. Enjoy!
And then,
It’s a brave new food world out there. I wonder how cell-cultured dinosaur meat tastes…
I am endlessly fascinated by the plant-based industry producing products to substitute for animal foods. Here are a few samples of what’s happening in this area.
Domestic
International
FoodNavigator–Asia, a newsletter I subscribe to, publishes articles on reformulation and has now collected them in one place.
Reformulation is what happens when companies change the mix of food product ingredients to make them healthier—or at least to appear healthier-. This is a highly effective sales strategy.
But reformulation raises philosophical questions:
Never mind. Here’s what food companies are doing these days, at least in Asia.
Special Edition: Reformulation: Sugar, Salts, Fats and Oils
Governments across the region are continuing to enforce policies to reduce sugar, salts, fats, and certain oils. In this special edition, we’ll showcase the companies providing the most innovative solutions and brands at the forefront of this charge.
New product launches
Chocolate hazards
Research breakthroughs
Comments
Sigh.
Marshmallows and upcycled sawdust. Yum?
Chocolate is always in the news for one reason or another.
As for cinnamon and cognitive function, if only. The authors declare no conflicted interests.
*******
For 30% off, go to www.ucpress.edu/9780520384156. Use code 21W2240 at checkout.
None of this stuff is on the market yet, which is good or bad depending on how you look on it. Maybe it’s just me, but these in-the-works products seem weird beyond belief.
Here’s what I’ve collected recently.
Even weirder, but perhaps more palatable, is making protein out of air.
And here is a report from Food and Water Watch
Digital marketing, especially when targeted to children, is a rising source of concern and for well-documented reasons.
Two reports provide the data. The big issue? Digital marketing promotes unhealthful eating.
I. From the World Health Organization’s Regional Office in Europe: Digital Food Environments Factsheet
Digital technologies are becoming integrated to varying degrees into everyday life across the 53 countries of the WHO European Region. The increase in digital technologies can increase the convenience of food and prepared meals. A recent unrepresentative survey of 10 European countries found that every fifth meal was consumed outside of the home, with 80% from commercial outlets. The influence of digitalization on dietary behaviour, however, is not well understood, raising questions about its influence on the health and nutrition of adults and children.
II. From the U.S. Center for Digital Democracy comes Big Food, Big Tech, and the Global Childhood Obesity Pandemic
Some of the largest food and beverage corporations—including Coca-Cola, McDonald’s, and Pepsi—have, in effect, transformed themselves into Big Data businesses, acquiring specialist firms, establishing large in-house operations, and hiring teams of data scientists and technology experts to direct these systems. With these enhanced capabilities, they can more effectively engage in ad targeting—whether on the leading platforms or through their own mobile apps.
A growing body of academic research has documented the increasing presence of unhealthy food promotion in digital media, as well as clear patterns of youth engagement with major brands, and influences on health behaviors.
Tech platforms especially popular with young people—including Facebook’s Instagram, Amazon’s Twitch, ByteDance’s TikTok, and Google’s YouTube – are working with giant food and beverage companies, such as Coca Cola, KFC, Pepsi and McDonald’s, to promote sugar-sweetened soda, energy drinks, candy, fast food, and other unhealthy products across social media, gaming, and streaming video. The report offers fresh new analysis and insight into the most recent industry practices.
Comment: All this calls for regulation, of course. Any chance of that coming our way?
In a press release, the USDA says it is going to take action against Salmonella contamination of poultry in order to get closer to the national target of a 25% reduction in Salmonella illnesses.
Despite consistent reductions in the occurrence of Salmonella in poultry products, more than 1 million consumer illnesses due to Salmonella occur annually, and it is estimated (PDF, 1.4 MB) that over 23% of those illnesses are due to consumption of chicken and turkey…USDA intends to seek stakeholder feedback on specific Salmonella control and measurement strategies, including pilot projects, in poultry slaughter and processing establishments. A key component of this approach is encouraging preharvest controls to reduce Salmonella contamination coming into the slaughterhouse.
The North American Meat Institute says its members are happy to assist (Salmonella is a problem for poultry, not beef).
The National Chicken Council also pledged to assist with the pilot projects, but then put the onus of responsibility squarely on you.
Even with very low levels of pathogens, there is still the possibility of illness if a raw product is improperly handled or cooked. Increased consumer education about proper handling and cooking of raw meat must be part of any framework moving forward. Proper handling and cooking of poultry is the one thing that will eliminate any risk of foodborne illness. All bacteria potentially found on raw chicken, regardless of strain, are fully destroyed by handling the product properly and cooking it to an internal temperature of 165°.
The newly formed Coalition for Poultry Food Safety Reform, led by Center for Science in the Public Interest, welcomes the USDA’s announcement, but insists that USDA’s food safety oversight needs to extend from farm to fork.
Comment: The USDA’s jurisdiction starts at the slaughterhouse, but chickens coming into the plant are already contaminated with Salmonella. This means prevention has to start on the farm, and poultry producers would have to institute procedures to keep their flocks free of Salmonella. They would much rather you cooked your chicken properly.
The latest big Salmonella outbreak is due to onions, an FDA-regulated food.
FDA’s traceback investigation is ongoing but has identified ProSource Produce, LLC (also known as ProSource Inc.) of Hailey, Idaho, and Keeler Family Farms of Deming, New Mexico, as suppliers of potentially contaminated whole, fresh onions imported from the State of Chihuahua, Mexico.
Keeler Family Farms issued a voluntary recall. ProSource Produce LLC also issued a voluntary recall.
The CDC has the statistics:
Comment: I wrote about a previous onion recall last year. Food safety lawyer Bill Marler asks: What did we learn – or not – from the 2020 Salmonella Outbreak linked to onions? That investigation, as he emphasizes, identified probable causes:
- potentially contaminated sources of irrigation water;
- sheep grazing on adjacent land;
- signs of animal intrusion, including scat (fecal droppings), and large flocks of birds that may spread contamination; and
- food contact surfaces that had not been inspected, maintained, or cleaned as frequently as necessary to protect against the contamination of produce.
The FDA lists all the products that have been recalled so far. It also displays their labels. If you have onions from these companies, treat them like biosafety hazards. If you can’t bear to throw them out, at least boil them and sterilize everything they could have contacted.